Kim Jun-Hwee, Kim Myung-Joon, Kim Ha Yan, Lee Mi-Jung
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University, Severance Hospital.
Clin Imaging. 2014 Sep-Oct;38(5):710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
The objective of this study was to compare the radiation dose and image quality of pediatric abdominal computed tomography (CT) using a protocol reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and a protocol with both kVp and mAs modulation and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE).
We retrospectively reviewed pediatric abdominal CT examinations performed with both kVp and mAs modulation. These raw data were reconstructed with SAFIRE at different strengths from 2 to 4 (SAFIRE groups 2-4). Another set of age/sex-matched pediatric abdominal CT examinations were also reviewed, which were performed during the same period with only mAs modulation and FBP (control group). The radiation dose and image quality were compared between groups. The image quality was objectively evaluated as the noise measured in the liver, aorta, and spleen at the level of the main portal vein and the image quality was subjectively reviewed by two radiologists for diagnostic acceptability using a four-point scale (0: unacceptable; 1: worse than the control group, but acceptable; 2: comparable with the control group; and 3: better than the control group). An independent t test was used in order to compare the radiation dose. An independent t test with Bonferroni correction and generalized estimating equations were used for the comparison of the objective and subjective image quality, respectively.
Twenty-nine patients (M:F=19:10; mean age, 10.0 years) were enrolled in each group. The SAFIRE group, using the size-specific dose estimates calculation method showed a 64.2% radiation dose reduction (from 8.1 to 2.9 mGy, P<.05), compared with the results of the control group. The objective image noise of the SAFIRE groups 2 and 3 was comparable to that of the control group. The subjective image quality was the best in SAFIRE group 3 [odds ratio (OR) 3.015, P<.001 when comparing to SAFIRE group 0; OR 1.513, P<.001 when comparing to SAFIRE group 2].
Image acquisition with both kVp and mAs modulation and iterative reconstruction using SAFIRE with strength 3 can preserve the objective and subjective image quality of pediatric abdominal CT scans with less than half the radiation dose.
本研究的目的是比较采用滤波反投影(FBP)重建方案、kVp和mAs调制及正弦图确认迭代重建(SAFIRE)方案的儿童腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)的辐射剂量和图像质量。
我们回顾性分析了采用kVp和mAs调制进行的儿童腹部CT检查。这些原始数据用SAFIRE以2至4的不同强度进行重建(SAFIRE组2 - 4)。还回顾了另一组年龄/性别匹配的儿童腹部CT检查,这些检查是同期仅采用mAs调制和FBP进行的(对照组)。比较两组之间的辐射剂量和图像质量。图像质量通过在门静脉水平测量肝脏、主动脉和脾脏中的噪声进行客观评估,并且由两名放射科医生使用四点量表(0:不可接受;1:比对照组差,但可接受;2:与对照组相当;3:比对照组好)对诊断可接受性进行主观评估。使用独立t检验来比较辐射剂量。分别使用经Bonferroni校正的独立t检验和广义估计方程来比较客观和主观图像质量。
每组纳入29例患者(男:女 = 19:10;平均年龄10.0岁)。与对照组结果相比,采用特定体型剂量估计计算方法的SAFIRE组辐射剂量降低了64.2%(从8.1降至2.9 mGy,P <.05)。SAFIRE组2和3的客观图像噪声与对照组相当。主观图像质量在SAFIRE组3中最佳[与SAFIRE组0相比,优势比(OR)为3.015,P <.001;与SAFIRE组2相比,OR为1.513,P <.001]。
采用kVp和mAs调制以及强度为3的SAFIRE进行迭代重建的图像采集,可以在辐射剂量不到一半的情况下保持儿童腹部CT扫描的客观和主观图像质量。