Lee In Ho, Miller Neil R, Zan Elcin, Tavares Fabiana, Blitz Ari M, Sung Heejong, Yousem David M, Boland Michael V
1 Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N Wolfe St, Phipps B100F, Baltimore, MD 21287.
2 Department of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Nov;205(5):W512-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14527.
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that bitemporal hemianopsia (BHA) is the most common visual field (VF) defect in patients with pituitary macroadenoma and to assess the degree of optic pathway compression necessary to produce visual defects.
We reviewed the MRI findings and medical records of 119 patients with pituitary macroadenoma who had undergone formal assessment of VFs. We then evaluated the degree of optic pathway displacement caused by the pituitary macroadenoma, as observed on MR images. The classifications of optic pathway displacement included no contact, abutment but no displacement, mild displacement (< 3 mm), and moderate displacement (≥ 3 mm). Qualitative analysis classified VFs as normal or as having defects that were monocular, bitemporal, mixed (bitemporal with additional defects), homonymous, or nonspecific.
A total of 89 of 115 patients had an abnormal VF. Only one patient had true BHA. The most common defects were bitemporal or mixed defects (in 49 of 115 patients [42.6%]), likely because more than just the chiasm is often compressed by the pituitary macroadenoma. Classification of optic pathway displacement by the pituitary macroadenoma was as follows: 23 patients had no contact, eight had abutment but no displacement, 27 had mild displacement, and 57 had moderate displacement. In 78 of the 92 patients (84.8%) with pituitary macroadenoma that had contact with the optic pathway, contact was with the optic chiasm and the prechiasmal optic nerve. Of the 49 patients with bitemporal or mixed defects, 42 had moderate displacement of the optic pathway caused by their tumors.
BHA is exceedingly uncommon in patients with pituitary macroadenoma. However, although bitemporal and mixed defects are the most common abnormal VF findings, they were found in only 42.6% of patients. Such defects rarely occur if the tumor displaces the optic pathway less than 3 mm from baseline.
本研究的目的是检验以下假设,即双颞侧偏盲(BHA)是垂体大腺瘤患者中最常见的视野(VF)缺陷,并评估产生视觉缺陷所需的视神经通路受压程度。
我们回顾了119例接受过正式视野评估的垂体大腺瘤患者的MRI检查结果和病历。然后,我们评估了垂体大腺瘤在MR图像上引起的视神经通路移位程度。视神经通路移位的分类包括无接触、邻接但无移位、轻度移位(<3mm)和中度移位(≥3mm)。定性分析将视野分为正常或存在单眼、双颞侧、混合性(双颞侧伴其他缺陷)、同向性或非特异性缺陷。
115例患者中共有89例视野异常。只有1例患者有真正的双颞侧偏盲。最常见的缺陷是双颞侧或混合性缺陷(115例患者中有49例[42.6%]),可能是因为垂体大腺瘤通常不仅压迫视交叉。垂体大腺瘤引起的视神经通路移位分类如下:23例无接触,8例邻接但无移位,27例轻度移位,57例中度移位。在92例与视神经通路有接触的垂体大腺瘤患者中,78例(84.8%)与视交叉和视交叉前视神经有接触。在49例双颞侧或混合性缺陷患者中,42例因肿瘤导致视神经通路中度移位。
BHA在垂体大腺瘤患者中极为罕见。然而,尽管双颞侧和混合性缺陷是最常见的异常视野表现,但仅在42.6%的患者中发现。如果肿瘤使视神经通路移位距离基线小于3mm,则很少出现此类缺陷。