Krämer C, Pfister R, Boekels T, Michels G
Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Cologne, Kerpener-Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2016 Nov;111(8):708-714. doi: 10.1007/s00063-015-0107-y. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
Controversy still exists regarding inpatient monitoring of patients exposed to electrical injuries.
In a monocentric retrospective study, we evaluated the medical records of 169 patients admitted to the University Hospital of Cologne from January 2000 to January 2014 because of electrical trauma. The electrocardiogram (ECG) data of 40 patients were missing.
Patients in our collective were predominantly young men (60 %) with an average age of 17.5 ± 17 years (1 year to 73 years). The electrical trauma occurred occupational (20 %), domestic (65 %), and during leisure time (15 %). In the high-voltage (≥ 1000 V) group (n = 7; 71 % male; 40.0 ± 19.4 years) one death was reported, related to an open intracranial injury and cardiac arrest. Of the six surviving patients five showed normal ECGs and one a sinus tachycardia. In the low-voltage (< 1000 V) group (n = 162, 56 % male; 5.0 ± 4.3 years) the ECG findings were as follows: 104 normal, 5 sinus tachycardia, 3 sinus arrhythmia, 6 ST segment changes, 3 premature atrial contraction, 1 premature ventricular contraction, 1 atrio-ventricular (AV)-Block and 1 delta wave. In all, one patient showed a self-limiting supraventricular tachycardia.
Asymptomatic and stable patients without any risk factors and with a normal initial ECG need no inpatient cardiac monitoring after an electrical injury.
对于遭受电击伤患者的住院监测仍存在争议。
在一项单中心回顾性研究中,我们评估了2000年1月至2014年1月因电击伤入住科隆大学医院的169例患者的病历。40例患者的心电图(ECG)数据缺失。
我们研究中的患者以年轻男性为主(60%),平均年龄为17.5±17岁(1岁至73岁)。电击伤发生在工作场所(20%)、家庭(65%)和休闲时间(15%)。在高压(≥1000V)组(n = 7;71%为男性;40.0±19.4岁)中,报告了1例死亡,与开放性颅脑损伤和心脏骤停有关。6例存活患者中,5例心电图正常,1例为窦性心动过速。在低压(<1000V)组(n = 162,56%为男性;5.0±4.3岁)中,心电图结果如下:104例正常,5例窦性心动过速,3例窦性心律不齐,6例ST段改变,3例房性早搏,1例室性早搏,1例房室(AV)阻滞和1例δ波。总共1例患者出现自限性室上性心动过速。
无症状且稳定、无任何危险因素且初始心电图正常的患者在电击伤后无需住院心脏监测。