Warenits Alexandra-Maria, Aman Martin, Zanon Clara, Klimitz Felix, Kammerlander Andreas A, Laggner Anton, Horter Johannes, Kneser Ulrich, Bergmeister-Berghoff Anna Sophie, Schrögendorfer Klaus F, Bergmeister Konstantin D
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Center for Restoration of Extremity Function, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Nov 11;7:590758. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.590758. eCollection 2020.
Patients with high- and low-voltage electrical injuries differ in their clinical presentation from minor symptoms to life-threatening conditions. For an adequate diagnosis and treatment strategy a multidisciplinary team is often needed, due to the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation. To minimize costs and medical resources, especially for patients with mild symptoms presenting after low-voltage electrical injuries, risk stratification for the development of further complications is needed. During 2012-2019 two independent patient cohorts admitted with electrical injuries in two maximum care university hospitals in Germany and Austria were investigated to quantify risk factors for prolonged treatment, the need of surgery and death in low-voltage injuries. High-voltage injuries were used as reference in the analysis of the low-voltage electrical injury. We analyzed 239 admitted patients with low-voltage (75%; 276 ± 118 V), high-voltage (17%; 12.385 ± 28.896 V) or unclear voltage (8%). Overall mortality was 2% ( = 5) associated only with high-voltage injuries. Patients with low-voltage injuries presented with electrocution entry marks (63%), various neurological symptoms (31%), burn injuries (at least second degree) (23%), pain (27%), and cardiac symptoms (9%) including self-limiting thoracic pain and dysrhythmia without any therapeutic need. Seventy three percentage of patients with low-voltage injury were discharged within 24 h. The remaining patients stayed in the hospital (11 ± 10 days) for treatment of entry marks and burns, with an overall need for surgery of 12% in all low-voltage injuries. The only identified risk factors for prolonged hospital stay in patients with low-voltage electrical injuries were the treatment of burns and electric marks. In this multi-center analysis of hospitalized patients, low-voltage electrical injuries were not associated with cardiac arrhythmia or mortality. Therefore, we suggest that asymptomatic patients, without preexisting conditions, with low-voltage injury can be discharged after an initial check-up without prolonged monitoring.
高电压和低电压电损伤患者的临床表现各不相同,从轻微症状到危及生命的情况都有。由于临床表现的异质性,对于充分的诊断和治疗策略,通常需要一个多学科团队。为了尽量减少成本和医疗资源,特别是对于低电压电损伤后出现轻微症状的患者,需要对进一步并发症的发生进行风险分层。在2012年至2019年期间,对德国和奥地利两家大型大学医院收治的两批独立的电损伤患者队列进行了调查,以量化低电压损伤患者延长治疗、手术需求和死亡的风险因素。在低电压电损伤分析中,将高电压损伤用作对照。我们分析了239例入院患者,其中低电压(75%;276±118V)、高电压(17%;12385±28896V)或电压不明(8%)。总体死亡率为2%(n=5),仅与高电压损伤相关。低电压损伤患者表现为触电入口痕迹(63%)、各种神经症状(31%)、烧伤(至少二度)(23%)、疼痛(27%)和心脏症状(9%),包括自限性胸痛和无需任何治疗的心律失常。73%的低电压损伤患者在24小时内出院。其余患者住院(11±10天)以治疗入口痕迹和烧伤,所有低电压损伤患者的手术总需求为12%。低电压电损伤患者延长住院时间的唯一确定风险因素是烧伤和电痕的治疗。在这项对住院患者的多中心分析中,低电压电损伤与心律失常或死亡率无关。因此,我们建议,无基础疾病的无症状低电压损伤患者在初次检查后可以出院,无需长时间监测。