Suppr超能文献

农村与城市青少年避孕措施使用情况的比较。

Comparisons of Contraceptive Use between Rural and Urban Teens.

作者信息

Geske Savannah, Quevillon Randal, Struckman-Johnson Cindy, Hansen Keith

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota, 414 E Clark St, Vermillion, South Dakota.

Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota, 414 E Clark St, Vermillion, South Dakota.

出版信息

J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Feb;29(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to determine if barriers in rural areas might decrease an adolescent's likelihood of obtaining effective contraception. Previous studies have reported mixed results in comparisons of rural and urban contraception use.

DESIGN

Electronic survey.

SETTING

Midwestern Public University.

PARTICIPANTS

Undergraduate and graduate women.

INTERVENTIONS

Questionnaire.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants retrospectively recalled their contraceptive use and barriers to contraceptive use between the 9th and 12th grades.

RESULTS

A Barriers to Contraception Use Scale was created using exploratory factor analysis and yielded 31 questions with 1 underlying factor: barriers. Participants were identified as rural or urban using the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definition and the participant's self-identification. Overall, rural participants endorsed more barriers to accessing contraceptives than urban participants using the OMB definition (χ(2) (2; n = 388) = 2.04; P < .05), and self-identification (χ(2) (2; n = 398) = 2.37; P < .05). However, no differences were found in contraception use according to the OMB definition, t (380) = -1.90; P = .06, or self-identification, t (380) = -2.11; P > .05. The Barriers to Contraception Use Scale total score predicted whether an individual would have a prescription for contraceptives 70.5% of the time compared to the base rate of 54.1%.

CONCLUSION

Although no rural-urban differences in actual contraception use were found, rural participants reported more barriers to accessing contraception, and those who endorsed more barriers were less likely to obtain contraceptives while in high school. Pregnancy prevention programs should thus take these barriers into account when developing future interventions.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在确定农村地区的障碍因素是否会降低青少年获得有效避孕措施的可能性。以往研究在比较农村和城市地区避孕措施使用情况时结果不一。

设计

电子调查。

地点

中西部公立大学。

参与者

本科及研究生女性。

干预措施

问卷调查。

主要观察指标

参与者回顾性回忆其在9年级至12年级期间的避孕措施使用情况及避孕措施使用障碍。

结果

采用探索性因素分析创建了避孕措施使用障碍量表,该量表产生了31个问题及1个潜在因素:障碍。根据管理和预算办公室(OMB)的定义以及参与者的自我认定,将参与者分为农村或城市人群。总体而言,根据OMB定义(χ(2)(2;n = 388)= 2.04;P <.05)以及自我认定(χ(2)(2;n = 398)= 2.37;P <.05),农村参与者认可的获取避孕措施的障碍比城市参与者更多。然而,根据OMB定义,避孕措施使用情况无差异,t(380)= -1.90;P =.06,或自我认定,t(380)= -2.11;P >.05。与54.1%的基础比例相比,避孕措施使用障碍量表总分在70.5%的情况下能够预测个体是否会有避孕药处方。

结论

虽然在实际避孕措施使用方面未发现城乡差异,但农村参与者报告的获取避孕措施的障碍更多,且认可更多障碍的人在高中时获得避孕药的可能性较小。因此,预防怀孕项目在制定未来干预措施时应考虑这些障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验