• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中风康复中运动干预随机对照试验的方法学质量

Methodological Quality of Motor Intervention Randomized Controlled Trials in Stroke Rehabilitation.

作者信息

McIntyre Amanda, Campbell Nerissa, Vermeer Julianne, Mays Rachel, Janzen Shannon, Teasell Robert

机构信息

Lawson Health Research Institute, Parkwood Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.

Lawson Health Research Institute, Parkwood Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Feb;25(2):248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.024
PMID:26500172
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the methodological quality of motor intervention randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the stroke rehabilitation literature and to examine trends in quality over time.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted for all English articles (published up to December 2013) examining rehabilitation for motor recovery poststroke. All RCTs with a human sample, of which at least 50% had a stroke, were included in the analysis. A Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) score was assigned to assess methodological quality. A one-way analysis of variance was conducted to examine adherence to quality items overall and over time, with post hoc t-tests performed where appropriate.

RESULTS

Six hundred seventy-six RCTs met inclusion criteria, of which 32.0% had excellent, 42.0% good, 23.1% fair, and 3.0% poor methodological qualities. The overall mean PEDro score was 6.6 ± 1.6; with scores improving significantly between 1979-1983 and 2009-2013 (5.0 ± 1.4 versus 7.0 ± 1.5; P = .0003); however, no significant improvements in individual items were found (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed improvements in the total methodological quality of motor intervention RCTs in stroke rehabilitation over time. However, no relationship was found between individual quality items and improvement over time.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估发表在中风康复文献中的运动干预随机对照试验(RCT)的方法学质量,并研究质量随时间的变化趋势。

方法

对所有研究中风后运动恢复康复的英文文章(截至2013年12月发表)进行系统的文献检索。纳入分析的所有RCT均以人类为样本,其中至少50%的样本患有中风。采用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)评分来评估方法学质量。进行单因素方差分析以检验总体及随时间推移对质量项目的依从性,并在适当情况下进行事后t检验。

结果

676项RCT符合纳入标准,其中32.0%的方法学质量优秀,42.0%良好,23.1%中等,3.0%较差。PEDro总体平均评分为6.6±1.6;1979 - 1983年与2009 - 2013年之间评分有显著提高(5.0±1.4对7.0±1.5;P = 0.0003);然而,各单项未发现显著改善(P > 0.05)。

结论

本研究表明,随着时间的推移,中风康复中运动干预RCT的总体方法学质量有所提高。然而,未发现各单项质量项目与随时间的改善之间存在关联。

相似文献

1
Methodological Quality of Motor Intervention Randomized Controlled Trials in Stroke Rehabilitation.中风康复中运动干预随机对照试验的方法学质量
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Feb;25(2):248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
2
The evolution of stroke rehabilitation randomized controlled trials.中风康复随机对照试验的演变
Int J Stroke. 2014 Aug;9(6):789-92. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12272. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
3
Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation.中风康复随机对照试验中的结果评估。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;86(12):1007-12. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181587b3d.
4
The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad scale in stroke rehabilitation literature.在中风康复文献中,PEDro量表比Jadad量表能提供更全面的方法学质量衡量标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jul;58(7):668-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.002.
5
Differences in stroke rehabilitation motor and cognitive randomized controlled trials by world region: Number, sample size, and methodological quality.按世界区域划分的中风康复运动和认知随机对照试验的差异:数量、样本量和方法学质量。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;47(2):191-199. doi: 10.3233/NRE-203168.
6
A systematic review of randomized controlled trial characteristics for interventions to improve upper extremity motor recovery post stroke.一项针对改善脑卒中后上肢运动功能恢复的干预措施的随机对照试验特征的系统评价。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023 May;30(4):323-332. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2022.2035578. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
7
Randomized controlled trials in non-pharmacological rehabilitation research: a scoping review of the reporting of sample size calculation, randomization procedure, and statistical analyses.非药物康复研究中的随机对照试验:样本量计算、随机程序和统计分析报告的范围综述。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Dec;56(6):790-798. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06451-5. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
Methodologic Quality and Statistical Reporting of Physical Therapy Randomized Controlled Trials Relevant to Musculoskeletal Conditions.与肌肉骨骼疾病相关的物理治疗随机对照试验的方法学质量和统计报告
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.485. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Randomized controlled trial quality in pediatric physical therapy.随机对照试验在儿科物理治疗中的质量。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014 Aug;34(3):260-70. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2013.827142. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
10
There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of Physiotherapy Evidence Database quality scale for physiotherapy trials.物理治疗证据数据库质量量表对物理治疗试验具有汇聚效度和结构效度的证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):920-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.10.005. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Publication Rate and Consistency of Registered Trials of Motor-Based Stroke Rehabilitation.基于运动的脑卒中康复注册试验的发表率和一致性。
Neurology. 2021 Mar 30;96(13):617-626. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011660. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Stroke rehabilitation research needs to be different to make a difference.中风康复研究需要有所不同才能产生影响。
F1000Res. 2016 Jun 22;5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8722.1. eCollection 2016.