Tang Yun-Zhao, Wang Gang, Jiang Zhen-Huan, Yan Tian-Tian, Chen Yi-Jun, Yang Min, Meng Ling-Ling, Zhu Yan-Juan, Li Chen-Guang, Li Zhu, Yu Ping, Ni Chang-Lin
Key Laboratory of Hormones and Development (Ministry of Health), Metabolic Diseases Hospital and Tianjin Institute of Endocrinology, Tianjin Medical University, Tongan Road 66, Heping District, Tianjin, 300070 China.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015 Oct 19;7:91. doi: 10.1186/s13098-015-0087-3. eCollection 2015.
We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the three dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (vildagliptin, sitagliptin, and linagliptin) as add-on therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)inadequately controlled on dual combination of insulin and metformin or acarbose.
A total of 535 T2DM patients who failed to achieve glycemic control with insulin and a traditional oral hypoglycemic agent were randomized to receive vildagliptin, sitagliptin, or linagliptin. Body mass index, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting and postprandial plasma glucose (FPG and PPG), insulin dose, and adverse events were evaluated during the study.
The baseline HbA1c was 9.59 ± 1.84 % (vildagliptin group), 9.22 ± 1.60 % (sitagliptin group), and 9.58 ± 1.80 % (linagliptin group). At week 12 it was 8.16 ± 1.29 % (vildagliptin), 8.56 ± 1.96 % (linagliptin), and 8.26 ± 1.10 % (sitagliptin). The changes in HbA1c from baseline were -1.33 ± 0.11 % (vildagliptin), -0.84 ± 0.08 % (sitagliptin) and -0.81 ± 0.08 % (linagliptin), the vildagliptin group had the greatest reduction in HbA1c (P < 0.05). The proportions of patients that reached target HbA1c were 66.27 % (vildagliptin), 52.73 % (sitagliptin), and 55.49 % (linagliptin), the vildagliptin group had the highest one (P < 0.05). The baseline FPG and PPG values in the three groups were at the same level. At week 12, mean FPG levels in the vildagliptin (7.31 ± 1.50 mmol/L) and linagliptin (6.90 ± 1.55 mmol/L) groups were significantly lower than in the sitagliptin group (8.02 ± 4.48 mmol/L; P < 0.05); the linagliptin group had the lowest mean PPG followed by the vildagliptin group which was also significant lower (P = 0.000) than the sitagliptin group. Additionally, the required insulin dosage in the vildagliptin group was the lowest among the groups at weeks 6 and 12. Only mild AEs were reported during the study.
The three DPP-4 inhibitors appear to be effective and safe as add-on therapy for T2DM patients on dual combination of insulin and a traditional OHA. Vildagliptin was more effective in decreasing insulin requirement and achieving glycemic control when compared to the other two.
我们旨在评估三种二肽基肽酶4(DPP-4)抑制剂(维格列汀、西格列汀和利格列汀)作为胰岛素与二甲双胍或阿卡波糖双联治疗血糖控制不佳的中国2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的附加治疗的疗效和安全性。
总共535例使用胰岛素和传统口服降糖药血糖控制未达标的T2DM患者被随机分为接受维格列汀、西格列汀或利格列汀治疗。在研究期间评估体重指数、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c )、空腹和餐后血糖(FPG和PPG)、胰岛素剂量及不良事件。
基线HbA1c分别为:维格列汀组9.59±1.84%,西格列汀组9.22±1.60%,利格列汀组9.58±1.80%。 在第12周时,分别为:维格列汀组8.16±1.29%,利格列汀组8.56±1.96%,西格列汀组8.26±1.10%。 HbA1c自基线变化值分别为:维格列汀组-1.33±0.11%,西格列汀组-0.84±0.08%,利格列汀组 -0.81±0.08%,维格列汀组HbA1c降低幅度最大(P<0.05)。 达到目标HbA1c的患者比例分别为:维格列汀组66.27%,西格列汀组52.73%,利格列汀组55.49%,维格列汀组最高(P<0.05)。三组基线FPG 和PPG值处于同一水平。 第12周时,维格列汀组(7.31±1.50 mmol/L)和利格列汀组(6.90±1.55 mmol/L)的平均FPG水平显著低于西格列汀组(8.02±4.48 mmol/L;P<0.05);利格列汀组平均PPG最低,其次维格列汀组也显著低于西格列汀组(P=0.000)。 此外,维格列汀组在第6周和第12周时所需胰岛素剂量在各组中最低。 研究期间仅报告了轻度不良事件。
结论。三种DPP-4抑制剂作为胰岛素与传统口服降糖药双联治疗的T2DM患者的附加治疗似乎有效且安全。 与其他两种药物相比,维格列汀在降低胰岛素需求和实现血糖控制方面更有效。