• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Public Submissions on the Uganda National Biotechnology and Biosafety Bill, 2012 Reveal Potential Way Forward for Uganda Legislators to Pass the Bill.关于《2012年乌干达国家生物技术与生物安全法案》的公众意见提交,为乌干达立法者通过该法案揭示了可能的前进方向。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015 Oct 6;3:152. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00152. eCollection 2015.
2
Strengthening regulatory capacity for gene drives in Africa: leveraging NEPAD's experience in establishing regulatory systems for medicines and GM crops in Africa.加强非洲基因驱动的监管能力:借鉴新伙伴关系在非洲建立药品和转基因作物监管系统的经验。
BMC Proc. 2018 Jul 19;12(Suppl 8):11. doi: 10.1186/s12919-018-0108-y. eCollection 2018.
3
The emerging international regulatory framework for biotechnology.生物技术的新兴国际监管框架。
GM Crops Food. 2012 Jan-Mar;3(1):78-84. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.19363. Epub 2012 Jan 1.
4
Readiness for Environmental Release of Genetically Engineered (GE) Plants in Uganda.乌干达转基因植物的环境释放准备情况。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018 Oct 24;6:152. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00152. eCollection 2018.
5
Biosafety regulatory frameworks in Kenya, Nigeria, Uganda and Sweden and their potential impact on international R&D collaborations.肯尼亚、尼日利亚、乌干达和瑞典的生物安全监管框架及其对国际研发合作的潜在影响。
GM Crops Food. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):1-17. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2194221.
6
Regulatory framework for genetically modified organisms in the Kingdom of Eswatini.斯威士兰王国的转基因生物监管框架。
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):212-221. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2375664. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
7
Development of agribiotechnology and biosafety regulations used to assess safety of genetically modified crops in Bangladesh.孟加拉国农业生物技术的发展以及用于评估转基因作物安全性的生物安全法规。
J AOAC Int. 2007 Sep-Oct;90(5):1508-12.
8
[Important points in virus research using recombinant DNA technology].
Uirusu. 2007 Jun;57(1):91-100. doi: 10.2222/jsv.57.91.
9
When Policy Meets Practice: The Dilemma for Guidance on Risk Assessment Under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.当政策遇上实践:《卡塔赫纳生物安全议定书》下风险评估指南的困境
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 May 1;7:82. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00082. eCollection 2019.
10
Towards Better Governance on Biosafety and Biosecurity: China's Advances and Perspectives in Medical Biotechnology Legislation.迈向生物安全与生物安保的更好治理:中国在医学生物技术立法方面的进展与展望
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jul 4;10:939295. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.939295. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
The legal aspect of the current use of genetically modified organisms in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda.肯尼亚、坦桑尼亚和乌干达目前使用转基因生物的法律方面。
GM Crops Food. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2208999.

本文引用的文献

1
Republished study: long-term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize.重新发表的研究:一种草甘膦除草剂和一种抗草甘膦转基因玉米的长期毒性
Environ Sci Eur. 2014;26(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12302-014-0014-5. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
2
Conflicts of interests, confidentiality and censorship in health risk assessment: the example of an herbicide and a GMO.健康风险评估中的利益冲突、保密与审查:以一种除草剂和一种转基因生物为例
Environ Sci Eur. 2014;26(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12302-014-0013-6. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
3
What the French ban of Bt MON810 maize means for science-based risk assessment.法国对转基因抗虫玉米MON810的禁令对基于科学的风险评估意味着什么。
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Jun;31(6):498-500. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2613.
4
Plant biotechnology: Tarnished promise.植物生物技术:被玷污的承诺。
Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):21. doi: 10.1038/497021a.
5
Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize.草甘膦除草剂和抗草甘膦转基因玉米的长期毒性
Food Chem Toxicol. 2012 Nov;50(11):4221-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
6
Fears over Europe's GM crop plan.对欧洲转基因作物计划的担忧。
Nature. 2010 Jul 29;466(7306):542-3. doi: 10.1038/466542a.
7
Genetically modified abominations? Widespread opposition to GMOs might have deep-seated cultural causes.基因改造的怪物?公众对转基因生物的广泛反对可能有其深层的文化原因。
EMBO Rep. 2009 Nov;10(11):1187-90. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.230. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

关于《2012年乌干达国家生物技术与生物安全法案》的公众意见提交,为乌干达立法者通过该法案揭示了可能的前进方向。

Public Submissions on the Uganda National Biotechnology and Biosafety Bill, 2012 Reveal Potential Way Forward for Uganda Legislators to Pass the Bill.

作者信息

Masiga Clet Wandui

机构信息

Tropical Institute of Development Innovations , Entebbe , Uganda.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015 Oct 6;3:152. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00152. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2015.00152
PMID:26501057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4594032/
Abstract

The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity is an internationally binding instrument addressing issues of biosafety. Biosafety refers to the need to protect human health and the environment from the possible adverse effects of the products of modern biotechnology. Accordingly, all countries to the convention are required to put in place regulatory mechanisms to enhance the safety of biotechnology in the context of the Convention's overall goal of reducing all potential threats to biological diversity, while taking into account the risks to human health. Therefore, each country party to the convention has its own procedures to enact laws to guide the safe use of biotechnology. In Uganda, the process involves the drafting of the bill by the first parliamentary counsel, approval by cabinet, first reading at the parliament, committal to the responsible parliamentary sessional committee, tabling of the bill for public hearing, consultations, and final approval. In Uganda, the Committee on Science and Technology is responsible for the Biosafety Bill. In March 2013, the Committee tabled the bill for public hearing and submissions from public institutions. There were comments supporting the passage of the Bill and comments in objection. The reasons for objection are mainly due to precaution, speculation, lack of knowledge about biotechnology and biosafety, and alleged influence from biosafety entrepreneurs. This article reviews these public views, revealing controversy and possible consensus to pass the bill.

摘要

《生物多样性公约》的《卡塔赫纳生物安全议定书》是一项处理生物安全问题的具有国际约束力的文书。生物安全是指保护人类健康和环境免受现代生物技术产品可能产生的不利影响的必要性。因此,该公约的所有缔约国都必须建立监管机制,以便在公约减少对生物多样性的所有潜在威胁这一总体目标的背景下,提高生物技术的安全性,同时考虑到对人类健康的风险。因此,该公约的每个缔约国都有自己的程序来制定法律,以指导生物技术的安全使用。在乌干达,这一过程包括由首席议会法律顾问起草法案、内阁批准、在议会进行一读、提交给负责的议会会议委员会、将法案提交公众听证、进行磋商以及最终批准。在乌干达,科学技术委员会负责生物安全法案。2013年3月,该委员会将法案提交公众听证并征求公共机构的意见。有支持该法案通过的意见,也有反对意见。反对的原因主要是出于预防、猜测、对生物技术和生物安全缺乏了解以及所谓的生物安全企业家的影响。本文回顾了这些公众意见,揭示了围绕该法案通过的争议以及可能达成的共识。