The predicament of comparative effectiveness research using observational data.
作者信息
Curtis Jeptha P, Krumholz Harlan M
出版信息
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):799-800. doi: 10.7326/M15-2490. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The predicament of comparative effectiveness research using observational data.利用观察性数据进行比较效果研究的困境。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):799-800. doi: 10.7326/M15-2490. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
2
Bayesian data analysis in observational comparative effectiveness research: rationale and examples.观察性比较有效性研究中的贝叶斯数据分析：原理与实例。
J Comp Eff Res. 2013 Nov;2(6):563-71. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.73.
3
Angiography guided therapy in an all comer acute coronary syndrome patient population.
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 12;168(5):4900-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.103. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
4
Radial versus femoral access in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征中桡动脉与股动脉入路对比
Lancet. 2011 Aug 20;378(9792):661; author reply 661-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61325-1.
5
[Angioplasty and stenting of the renal artery in a patient undergoing coronary angiography due to suspected acute coronary syndrome].[因疑似急性冠状动脉综合征接受冠状动脉造影的患者的肾动脉血管成形术和支架置入术]
Kardiol Pol. 2009 Jan;67(1):91-3; discussion 94.
6
Radial versus femoral access in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征中桡动脉与股动脉入路的比较。
Lancet. 2011 Aug 20;378(9792):661; author reply 661-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61324-X.
7
[Second acute coronary syndrome due to acute occlusion of previously non-infarct related coronary artery in the patient treated with primary angioplasty--not only stenosis matters].
Kardiol Pol. 2007 Oct;65(10):1255-7; discussion 1258.
8
Invasive strategy for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes revisited.非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征的侵入性治疗策略再探讨。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2009 Apr;28(4):375-81.
9
[The TIMACS study].
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2010 Feb;11(2):96-101.
10
The nonculprit coronary lesion as seen by coronary CT angiography: what should we be looking for?冠状动脉CT血管造影所见的非罪犯冠状动脉病变：我们应该寻找什么？
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):439-40. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1276.
引用本文的文献
1
Association of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Use With Mortality Rates in Older Adults With Acute Pulmonary Embolism.下腔静脉滤器使用与老年急性肺栓塞患者死亡率的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):263-265. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5287.
2
Factors That Influence Selectionof Urinary Diversion Among Bladder Cancer Patients in 3 Community-based Integrated Health Care Systems.在3个基于社区的综合医疗保健系统中影响膀胱癌患者尿流改道选择的因素
Urology. 2019 Mar;125:222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.09.037. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
3
Inferior Vena Cava Filters to Prevent Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.下腔静脉滤器预防肺栓塞：系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 26;70(13):1587-1597. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.775.
4
Effect of Adherence to Oral Anticoagulants on Risk of Stroke and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.口服抗凝剂依从性对心房颤动患者中风风险和大出血的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 23;5(2):e003074. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003074.
本文引用的文献
1
Effectiveness of an early versus a conservative invasive treatment strategy in acute coronary syndromes: a nationwide cohort study.急性冠状动脉综合征中早期与保守侵入性治疗策略的有效性：一项全国性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):737-46. doi: 10.7326/M15-0303. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
2
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.与随机试验中评估的医疗保健结果相比，观察性研究设计评估的医疗保健结果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2.
3
Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research: the PCORI perspective.方法学标准与以患者为中心在比较效果研究中的应用：PCORI 的观点。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1636-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.466.
4
A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness research.推进比较有效性研究方法的 CTSA 议程。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Jun;4(3):188-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00282.x.
5
Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南的科学依据。
JAMA. 2009 Feb 25;301(8):831-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.205.
6
Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.急性冠脉综合征患者的常规与选择性侵入性策略：随机试验的协作荟萃分析
JAMA. 2005 Jun 15;293(23):2908-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.23.2908.
7
Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy.实用临床试验：提高临床研究在临床和卫生政策决策中的价值。
JAMA. 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1624-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1624.
8
Developing improved observational methods for evaluating therapeutic effectiveness.开发用于评估治疗效果的改进观察方法。
Am J Med. 1990 Nov;89(5):630-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90182-d.
Zotero 插件