Yang Zi-bo, Wang Bing-jun, Wu Pei-hui, Huang Zhi-yu, Fu Ming, Liao Wei-ming, He Ai-shan, Kang Yan
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Aug;28(8):699-703.
To determine the difference of post-operative mortality between ORIF (open reduction internal fixation) and hip replacement for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly by using survival analysis.
The clinical data of 110 patients above 60 years old who underwent surgical treatment (ORIF or hip replacement) for the intertrochanteric fracture between April 2003 and May 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Among the patients, 83 cases were treated with ORIF (ORIF group), there were 32 males and 51 females, aged from 61.44 to 98.75 years old with an average of (78.52 ± 7.98) years old; and 27 cases were treated with hip replacement (arthroplasty group), there were 8 males and 19 females, aged from 71.82 to 96.54 years old with an average of (79.99 ± 6.11) years old. A survival analysis was performed on the clinical data by using SPSS 110 software. The survival rate of 1-year,2-year, 5-year and the mean survival time for the total patients, the mortality rate of 1-year, 2-year in each group, the survival rate of 1-year, 2-year and mean survival time and survival curve in each group were included.
All wounds achieved primary healing and no deaths were found in stay hospital. All patients were followed up from 1 to 125 months with an average of (46.93 ± 29.53) months. Among all 110 cases, 31 were dead and 79 survived. The survival rate of 1-year, 2-year and 5-year was (90.7 ± 2.8)%, (82.5 ± 3.9)% and (57.6 ± 6.5)%, respectively,while the ensemble mean survival time was (84.137 ± 5.902) months. The mortality rate of 1-year, 2-year in ORIF group was 7.2% and 12.0%, respectively; and in arthroplasty group, there was 14.8% and 25.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference in mortality rate of 1-year and 2-year between two groups. According to the survival analysis of the ORIF group, the survival rate of 1-year, 2-year was (92.6 ± 2.9)%, and (85.8 ± 4.3)%, respectively, and the mean survival time was (87.508 ± 6.063) months. In arthroplasty group, the survival rate of 1-year, 2-year was (85.2 ± 6.8)% and (73.9 ± 8.5)%,and the mean survival time was (67.294 ± 11.180) months. There was significant difference in mean survival time between two groups (P < 0.05).
ORIF can achieve a better postoperative survival compare with hip replacement in treating intertrochanteric fracture in elderly.
采用生存分析方法确定老年股骨转子间骨折手术治疗中切开复位内固定术(ORIF)与髋关节置换术术后死亡率的差异。
回顾性分析2003年4月至2013年5月间110例60岁以上接受手术治疗(ORIF或髋关节置换)的股骨转子间骨折患者的临床资料。患者中,83例行ORIF治疗(ORIF组),男32例,女51例,年龄61.44至98.75岁,平均(78.52±7.98)岁;27例行髋关节置换术(关节成形术组),男8例,女19例,年龄71.82至96.54岁,平均(79.99±6.11)岁。使用SPSS 11.0软件对临床资料进行生存分析。纳入全体患者的1年、2年、5年生存率及平均生存时间,每组的1年、2年死亡率,每组的1年、2年生存率、平均生存时间及生存曲线。
所有伤口均一期愈合,住院期间无死亡病例。所有患者均获随访1至125个月,平均(46.93±29.53)个月。110例患者中,31例死亡,79例存活。1年、2年、5年生存率分别为(90.7±2.8)%、(82.5±3.9)%、(57.6±6.5)%,全体平均生存时间为(84.137±5.902)个月。ORIF组1年、2年死亡率分别为7.2%和12.0%;关节成形术组分别为14.8%和25.9%。两组1年、2年死亡率差异无统计学意义。根据ORIF组生存分析,1年、2年生存率分别为(92.6±2.9)%、(85.8±4.3)%,平均生存时间为(87.508±6.063)个月。关节成形术组1年、2年生存率分别为(85.2±6.8)%、(73.9±8.5)%,平均生存时间为(67.294±11.180)个月。两组平均生存时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
在治疗老年股骨转子间骨折方面,与髋关节置换术相比,ORIF术后生存率更佳。