Shida Dai, Wakamatsu Kotaro, Tanaka Yuu, Yoshimura Atsushi, Kawaguchi Masahiko, Miyamoto Sachio, Tagawa Kyoko
Colorectal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Cyuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, 4-23-15 Koto-bashi, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, 1308575, Japan.
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 26;15:799. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1799-3.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols may reduce postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay. Studies of the effectiveness of ERAS should include not only doctor-reported outcomes, but also patient-reported outcomes, in order to better estimate their impact on recovery. However, patient-reported outcomes are not commonly reported. Thus, it needs to be assessed whether early discharge from the hospital is compatible with a better outcome from the viewpoint of the patients themselves.
The 40-item quality of recovery score (QoR-40) is a recovery-specific, and patient-rated questionnaire, which provides a good measurement of early postoperative recovery. Ninety-four colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery under ERAS protocol management were asked to answer QoR-40 questionnaires preoperatively and on post-operative day (POD) 1, 3, 6 and one month after surgery.
The median (25th, 75th percentiles) preoperative global QoR-40 scores as an indicator of the baseline health status, was 189 (176.75, 197). On POD1 and POD3, the scores had decreased significantly to 154 (132.5, 164.25) and 177 (161.75, 190), respectively. On POD 6, the score dramatically recovered up to 183.5 (167.9, 191), which was not significantly different from the baseline level (p = 0.06). The scores at 1 month after surgery were 190 (176, 197). Younger patients, compared to older patients, and rectal cancer patients, compared to colon cancer patients, had significantly lower scores on POD1.
This study clearly demonstrated that the quality of recovery based on patient-reported outcomes is in agreement with discharge around POD6 for colorectal cancer patients under ERAS.
术后加速康复(ERAS)方案可能会减少术后并发症及缩短住院时间。对ERAS有效性的研究不仅应包括医生报告的结果,还应包括患者报告的结果,以便更好地评估其对康复的影响。然而,患者报告的结果并不常被报道。因此,需要从患者自身的角度评估早期出院是否与更好的结果相兼容。
40项康复质量评分(QoR-40)是一份针对康复情况且由患者自评的问卷,能很好地衡量术后早期康复情况。94例接受ERAS方案管理下手术的结直肠癌患者被要求在术前以及术后第1天、第3天、第6天和术后1个月回答QoR-40问卷。
作为基线健康状况指标的术前总体QoR-40评分中位数(第25、75百分位数)为189(176.75,197)。在术后第1天和第3天,评分分别显著降至154(132.5,164.25)和177(161.75,190)。在术后第6天,评分大幅恢复至183.5(167.9,191),与基线水平无显著差异(p = 0.06)。术后1个月的评分为190(176,197)。与老年患者相比,年轻患者以及与结肠癌患者相比,直肠癌患者在术后第1天的评分显著更低。
本研究清楚地表明,对于接受ERAS的结直肠癌患者,基于患者报告结果的康复质量与术后第6天左右出院相符。