Rüdiger Hannes A, Parvex Valérie, Terrier Alexandre
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; Laboratory of Biomechanical Orthopedics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar;31(3):715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.044. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
Although the importance of accurate femoral reconstruction to achieve a good functional outcome is well documented, quantitative data on the effects of a displacement of the femoral center of rotation on moment arms are scarce. The purpose of this study was to calculate moment arms after nonanatomical femoral reconstruction.
Finite element models of 15 patients including the pelvis, the femur, and the gluteal muscles were developed. Moment arms were calculated within the native anatomy and compared to distinct displacement of the femoral center of rotation (leg lengthening of 10 mm, loss of femoral offset of 20%, anteversion ±10°, and fixed anteversion at 15°). Calculations were performed within the range of motion observed during a normal gait cycle.
Although with all evaluated displacements of the femoral center of rotation, the abductor moment arm remained positive, some fibers initially contributing to extension became antagonists (flexors) and vice versa. A loss of 20% of femoral offset led to an average decrease of 15% of abductor moment. Femoral lengthening and changes in femoral anteversion (±10°, fixed at 15°) led to minimal changes in abductor moment arms (maximum change of 5%). Native femoral anteversion correlated with the changes in moment arms induced by the 5 variations of reconstruction.
Accurate reconstruction of offset is important to maintaining abductor moment arms, while changes of femoral rotation had minimal effects. Patients with larger native femoral anteversion appear to be more susceptible to femoral head displacements.
尽管准确的股骨重建对于获得良好功能结果的重要性已有充分记录,但关于股骨旋转中心位移对力臂影响的定量数据却很少。本研究的目的是计算非解剖学股骨重建后的力臂。
建立了15例患者包括骨盆、股骨和臀肌的有限元模型。在正常解剖结构内计算力臂,并与股骨旋转中心的不同位移(腿延长10毫米、股骨偏心距减少20%、前倾角±10°以及固定前倾角为15°)进行比较。在正常步态周期观察到的运动范围内进行计算。
尽管在所有评估的股骨旋转中心位移情况下,外展肌力臂均保持为正,但一些最初有助于伸展的纤维变成了拮抗肌(屈肌),反之亦然。股骨偏心距减少20%导致外展肌力臂平均下降15%。股骨延长和股骨前倾角变化(±10°,固定为15°)导致外展肌力臂变化最小(最大变化5%)。股骨的自然前倾角与重建的5种变化引起的力臂变化相关。
准确重建偏心距对于维持外展肌力臂很重要,而股骨旋转的变化影响最小。股骨自然前倾角较大的患者似乎更容易发生股骨头移位。