• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用放射生物学模型进行部分乳腺照射的大分割放疗

Hypofractionation of partial breast irradiation using radiobiological models.

作者信息

Avanzo Michele, Trovo Marco, Stancanello Joseph, Jena Rajesh, Roncadin Mario, Toffoli Giulia, Zuiani Chiara, Capra Elvira

机构信息

Medical Physics Department, CRO Aviano, 33081 Aviano, Italy.

Radiation Oncology Department, CRO Aviano, 33081 Aviano, Italy.

出版信息

Phys Med. 2015 Dec;31(8):1022-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.016. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.016
PMID:26508014
Abstract

PURPOSE

To reduce the fraction number in Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI) with initial prescription of 40 Gy in 10 fractions using radiobiological models with specific focus on risk of moderate/severe radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) and report clinical results.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

68 patients (patient group A) were treated with 40 Gy in 10 fractions delivered by field-in-field, forward-planned IMRT. Isotoxic regimens with decreasing number of fractions were calculated using Biological Effective Dose (BED) to the breast. Risk for RIF in hypofractionated treatment was predicted by calculating NTCP from DVHs of group A rescaled to fractions and dose of novel regimens. Moderate/severe RIF was prospectively scored during follow-up. Various NTCP models, with and without incomplete repair correction, were assessed from difference to observed incidence of RIF. In order to verify the value for α/β of 3 Gy assumed for breast, we fitted α/β to observed incidences of moderate/severe RIF.

RESULTS

Treatments with 35 Gy/7f and 28 Gy/4f were selected for the fraction reduction protocol. 75 patients (group B) were treated in 35 Gy/7f. Incidence of moderate/severe RIF was 5.9% in group A, 5.3% in group B. The NTCP model with correction for incomplete repair had lowest difference from observed RIF. The α/β obtained from fitting was 2.8 (95%CIs 1.1-10.7) Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypofractionated regimen was well tolerated. The model for NTCP corrected for incomplete repair was the most accurate and an assumed α/β value of 3 Gy is consistent with our patient data. The hypofractionation protocol is continuing with patients treated with 28 Gy/4f.

摘要

目的

利用放射生物学模型,将初始处方为40 Gy分10次照射的部分乳腺照射(PBI)的分次次数减少,特别关注中度/重度放射性纤维化(RIF)的风险,并报告临床结果。

方法和材料

68例患者(A组)接受了适形野、正向计划调强放疗,分10次给予40 Gy。使用乳腺的生物等效剂量(BED)计算分次次数减少的等毒性方案。通过将A组的剂量体积直方图(DVH)重新调整为新方案的分次次数和剂量来计算超分割治疗中RIF的风险。在随访期间对中度/重度RIF进行前瞻性评分。根据RIF的观察发生率差异,评估了各种有或无不完全修复校正的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)模型。为了验证乳腺假定的α/β值为3 Gy,我们将α/β值与中度/重度RIF的观察发生率进行拟合。

结果

选择35 Gy/7次和28 Gy/4次的治疗方案进行分次减少方案。75例患者(B组)接受了35 Gy/7次的治疗。A组中度/重度RIF的发生率为5.9%,B组为5.3%。校正不完全修复的NTCP模型与观察到的RIF差异最小。拟合得到的α/β值为2.8(95%可信区间1.1 - 10.7)Gy。

结论

超分割方案耐受性良好。校正不完全修复的NTCP模型最准确,假定的α/β值3 Gy与我们的患者数据一致。超分割方案正在继续用于接受28 Gy/4次治疗的患者。

相似文献

1
Hypofractionation of partial breast irradiation using radiobiological models.使用放射生物学模型进行部分乳腺照射的大分割放疗
Phys Med. 2015 Dec;31(8):1022-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.016. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
2
Complication probability model for subcutaneous fibrosis based on published data of partial and whole breast irradiation.基于部分和全乳照射发表数据的皮下纤维化并发症概率模型。
Phys Med. 2012 Oct;28(4):296-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
3
Modern hypofractionation schedules for tangential whole breast irradiation decrease the fraction size-corrected dose to the heart.现代切线野全乳腺照射的适形分割方案降低了心脏的分次剂量校正值。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013 Mar;25(3):147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
4
Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.调强放射治疗与三维适形放射治疗在前列腺癌治疗中的剂量学及放射生物学模型比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 May 1;59(1):267-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.024.
5
The minimal FLASH sparing effect needed to compensate the increase of radiobiological damage due to hypofractionation for late-reacting tissues.需要最小化 FLASH 效应以补偿由于晚反应组织的分割减少导致的放射生物损伤的增加。
Med Phys. 2022 Dec;49(12):7672-7682. doi: 10.1002/mp.15911. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
6
Hypofractionation: what does it mean for prostate cancer treatment?少分割放射治疗:对前列腺癌治疗意味着什么?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jan 1;76(1):260-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.043.
7
The radiobiology of hypofractionation.大分割放疗的放射生物学
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2015 May;27(5):260-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
8
Toxicity and cosmesis following partial breast irradiation consisting of 40 Gy in 10 daily fractions.部分乳房照射(每日 10 次,每次 40Gy)后的毒性和美容效果。
Breast. 2013 Oct;22(5):744-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
9
Radiobiological impact of dose calculation algorithms on biologically optimized IMRT lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans.剂量计算算法对生物优化的IMRT肺部立体定向体部放射治疗计划的放射生物学影响。
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jan 22;11:10. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0578-2.
10
Moderate Hypofractionated Protracted Radiation Therapy and Dose Escalation for Prostate Cancer: Do Dose and Overall Treatment Time Matter?前列腺癌的中等分割延长放疗及剂量递增:剂量和总治疗时间重要吗?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Feb 1;94(2):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.055. Epub 2015 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of three distinct once-daily schedules for accelerated partial breast irradiation.三种不同的每日一次加速局部乳腺照射方案的长期结果。
Breast. 2025 Jun;81:104459. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104459. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
2
Electron Density and Biologically Effective Dose (BED) Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models to Predict Late Radiation-Induced Subcutaneous Fibrosis.基于电子密度和生物学有效剂量(BED)的放射组学机器学习模型预测晚期放射性皮下纤维化
Front Oncol. 2020 Apr 21;10:490. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00490. eCollection 2020.
3
Seven fractions to deliver partial breast irradiation: the toxicity is Low.
七次分割进行部分乳腺照射:毒性较低。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 May 23;12(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0825-9.