Suppr超能文献

急性肺栓塞后慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压的临床预测评分的推导。

Derivation of a clinical prediction score for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism.

机构信息

Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jan;14(1):121-8. doi: 10.1111/jth.13175. Epub 2015 Dec 29.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Essentials Predicting chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) after pulmonary embolism is hard. We studied 772 patients with pulmonary embolism who were followed for CTEPH (incidence 2.8%). Logistic regression analysis revealed 7 easily collectable clinical variables that combined predict CTEPH. Our score identifies patients at low (0.38%) or higher (10%) risk of CTEPH.

SUMMARY

Introduction Validated risk factors for the diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) after acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are currently lacking. Methods This is a post hoc patient-level analysis of three large prospective cohorts with a total of 772 consecutive patients with acute PE, without major cardiopulmonary or malignant comorbidities. All underwent echocardiography after a median of 1.5 years. In cases with signs of pulmonary hypertension, additional diagnostic tests to confirm CTEPH were performed. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics of the acute PE event were included in a multivariable regression analysis. Independent predictors were combined in a clinical prediction score. Results CTEPH was confirmed in 22 patients (2.8%) by right heart catheterization. Unprovoked PE, known hypothyroidism, symptom onset > 2 weeks before PE diagnosis, right ventricular dysfunction on computed tomography or echocardiography, known diabetes mellitus and thrombolytic therapy or embolectomy were independently associated with a CTEPH diagnosis during follow-up. The area under the receiver operating charateristic curve (AUC) of the prediction score including those six variables was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.94). Sensitivity analysis and bootstrap internal validation confirmed this AUC. Seventy-three per cent of patients were in the low-risk category (CTEPH incidence of 0.38%, 95% CI 0-1.5%) and 27% were in the high-risk category (CTEPH incidence of 10%, 95% CI 6.5-15%). Conclusion The 'CTEPH prediction score' allows for the identification of PE patients with a high risk of CTEPH diagnosis after PE. If externally validated, the score may guide targeting of CTEPH screening to at-risk patients.

摘要

目的

在肺栓塞(PE)后预测慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)很困难。我们研究了 772 例 PE 患者,这些患者接受了 CTEPH 随访(发生率为 2.8%)。Logistic 回归分析揭示了 7 个易于收集的临床变量,这些变量联合预测 CTEPH。我们的评分确定了 CTEPH 风险较低(0.38%)或较高(10%)的患者。

总结

背景:目前缺乏急性 PE 后诊断 CTEPH 的有效危险因素。方法:这是对三个大型前瞻性队列的事后患者水平分析,共纳入 772 例连续急性 PE 患者,无主要心肺或恶性合并症。所有患者在中位时间 1.5 年后均行超声心动图检查。如果存在肺动脉高压征象,则进行额外的诊断性检查以确认 CTEPH。将急性 PE 事件的基线人口统计学和临床特征纳入多变量回归分析。将独立的预测因子组合在一个临床预测评分中。结果:右心导管检查证实 22 例患者(2.8%)存在 CTEPH。无诱因性 PE、已知甲状腺功能减退症、PE 诊断前症状发作>2 周、CT 或超声心动图提示右心室功能障碍、已知糖尿病和溶栓治疗或血栓切除术与随访期间的 CTEPH 诊断独立相关。包含这 6 个变量的预测评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.89(95%置信区间[CI]0.84-0.94)。敏感性分析和 bootstrap 内部验证证实了这一 AUC。73%的患者处于低风险类别(CTEPH 发生率为 0.38%,95%CI 0-1.5%),27%的患者处于高风险类别(CTEPH 发生率为 10%,95%CI 6.5-15%)。结论:“CTEPH 预测评分”可用于识别 PE 患者中 PE 后 CTEPH 诊断风险较高的患者。如果经过外部验证,该评分可能有助于将 CTEPH 筛查目标对准高危患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验