Leucht Stefan, Helfer Bartosz, Dold Markus, Kissling Werner, McGrath John J
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, München, Germany, 81675.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 28;2015(10):CD003834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003834.pub3.
Many people with schizophrenia do not achieve a satisfactory treatment response with ordinary anti-psychotic drug treatment. In these cases, various add-on medications are used, among them lithium.
To assess whether:1. Lithium alone is an effective treatment for schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like psychoses and schizoaffective psychoses; and2. Lithium augmentation of antipsychotic medication is an effective treatment for the same illnesses.
In July 2012, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, BIOSIS, AMED, EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and registries of clinical trials. This search was updated on January 20, 2015. For the first version of the review, we also contacted pharmaceutical companies and authors of relevant studies to identify further trials and obtain original participant data.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of lithium compared with antipsychotics or placebo (or no intervention), whether as sole treatment or as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication, in the treatment of schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses or both.
We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data, we calculated random-effects meta-analyses, risk ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to create 'Summary of findings' tables and assessed risk of bias for included studies.
The update search in 2012 detected two further studies that met our inclusion criteria. We did not find any further studies that met our inclusion criteria in the 2015 search. This review now includes 22 studies, with a total of 763 participants (median mean age: 35 years, range: 26 to 72 years). Most studies were small, of short duration, and incompletely reported. As we detected a high risk of bias in many studies, the overall methodological quality of the included sample was rather low.Three small studies comparing lithium with placebo as the sole treatment showed no difference in any of the outcomes we analysed.In eight studies comparing lithium with antipsychotic drugs as the sole treatment, more participants in the lithium group left the studies early (eight RCTs; n = 270, RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.11, low quality evidence).Thirteen studies examined whether the augmentation of antipsychotic drugs with lithium salts is more effective than antipsychotic drugs alone. More participants who received lithium augmentation had a clinically significant response (10 RCTs; n = 396, RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.97, low quality evidence). However, this effect became non-significant when we excluded participants with schizoaffective disorders in a sensitivity analysis (seven RCTs; n = 272, RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.81), when we excluded non-double-blind studies (seven RCTs; n = 224, RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.84 to 3.96), or when we excluded studies with high attrition (nine RCTs; n = 355, RR 1.67, CI 0.93 to 3.00). The overall acceptability of treatment (measured by the number of participants leaving the studies early) was not significantly different between groups (11 RCTs; n = 320, RR 1.89, CI 0.93 to 3.84, very low quality evidence). Few studies reported on side effects. There were no significant differences, but the database is too limited to make any judgement in this regard. For example, there were no data on thyroid dysfunction and kidney problems - two major and well-known side effects of lithium.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base for the use of lithium in schizophrenia is limited to 22 studies of overall low methodological quality. There is no randomised trial-based evidence that lithium on its own is an effective treatment for people with schizophrenia. There is some GRADE low quality evidence that augmentation of antipsychotics with lithium is effective, but the effects are not significant when more prone-to-bias open RCTs are excluded. Nevertheless, further large and well-designed trials are justified. These should concentrate on two target groups: (1) people with no affective symptoms, so that trialists can determine whether lithium has an effect on the core symptoms of schizophrenia, and (2) people with schizoaffective disorders for whom lithium is widely used in clinical practice, although there is no evidence to support this use.
许多精神分裂症患者采用普通抗精神病药物治疗时,治疗反应并不理想。在这些情况下,会使用各种附加药物,其中包括锂盐。
评估:1. 锂盐单独使用是否是治疗精神分裂症、精神分裂症样精神病和分裂情感性精神病的有效疗法;2. 锂盐与抗精神病药物联合使用是否是治疗上述疾病的有效疗法。
2012年7月,我们检索了Cochrane精神分裂症研究组基于试验的研究注册库,该注册库基于定期检索CINAHL、BIOSIS、AMED、EMBASE、PubMed、MEDLINE、PsycINFO以及临床试验注册库。2015年1月20日对该检索进行了更新。对于本综述的第一版,我们还联系了制药公司和相关研究的作者,以识别更多试验并获取原始参与者数据。
锂盐与抗精神病药物或安慰剂(或无干预)对比的随机对照试验(RCT),无论是作为单一疗法还是作为抗精神病药物的辅助疗法,用于治疗精神分裂症或精神分裂症样精神病或两者。
我们独立提取数据。对于二分数据,我们基于意向性分析计算随机效应荟萃分析、风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。对于连续性数据,我们计算平均差(MD)和95%置信区间。我们使用推荐分级评估、制定与评价(GRADE)来创建“结果总结”表,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
2012年的更新检索发现了另外两项符合我们纳入标准的研究。2015年检索未发现符合我们纳入标准的其他研究。本综述现在包括22项研究,共763名参与者(年龄中位数:35岁,范围:26至72岁)。大多数研究规模小、持续时间短且报告不完整。由于我们在许多研究中检测到高偏倚风险,纳入样本的整体方法学质量相当低。三项将锂盐与安慰剂作为单一疗法进行比较的小型研究在我们分析的任何结果中均未显示出差异。八项将锂盐与抗精神病药物作为单一疗法进行比较的研究中,锂盐组更多参与者提前退出研究(八项RCT;n = 270,RR 1.77,95% CI 1.01至3.11,低质量证据)。十三项研究检验了锂盐增强抗精神病药物是否比单独使用抗精神病药物更有效。更多接受锂盐增强治疗的参与者有临床显著反应(十项RCT;n = 396,RR 1.81,95% CI 1.10至2.97,低质量证据)。然而,在敏感性分析中排除分裂情感性障碍参与者时(七项RCT;n = 272,RR 1.64,95% CI 0.95至2.81)、排除非双盲研究时(七项RCT;n = 224,RR 1.82,95% CI 0.84至3.96)或排除高损耗研究时(九项RCT;n = 355,RR 1.67,CI 0.93至3.00),这种效果变得不显著。治疗的总体可接受性(通过提前退出研究的参与者数量衡量)在组间无显著差异(十一项RCT;n = 320,RR 1.89,CI 0.93至3.84,极低质量证据)。很少有研究报告副作用。虽无显著差异,但数据库过于有限,无法在这方面做出任何判断。例如,没有关于甲状腺功能障碍和肾脏问题的数据——锂盐的两种主要且广为人知的副作用。
在精神分裂症中使用锂盐的证据基础仅限于22项总体方法学质量较低的研究。没有基于随机试验的证据表明锂盐单独使用对精神分裂症患者是一种有效的治疗方法。有一些GRADE低质量证据表明锂盐增强抗精神病药物有效,但排除更易产生偏倚的开放RCT后,效果不显著。尽管如此,仍有理由开展进一步的大型且设计良好的试验。这些试验应集中在两个目标群体:(1)无情感症状者,以便试验者能够确定锂盐是否对精神分裂症的核心症状有影响;(2)分裂情感性障碍患者,锂盐在临床实践中广泛用于此类患者,尽管尚无证据支持这种用法。