Ramer Lois, Hunt Pauline, Ortega Erin, Knowlton Jessica, Briggs Raymond, Hirokawa Shinichi
Los Angeles County + University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Los Angeles County + University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2016 Jul;33(4):273-81. doi: 10.1177/1043454215600425. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of VeinViewer for peripheral vascular accessing a pediatric hematology oncology clinic. After obtaining consent, 53 patients were randomly assigned to either the VeinViewer group (n = 27) or standard methods group (n = 26). Data on number of attempts, procedural time, access complications, and patient and nurse satisfaction were collected. Patients randomized to the VeinViewer group required significantly less time to access a vein as compared with the standard methods group (P ≤ .05). Additionally, these patients rated nurses as having significantly more skill than nurses who did not use VeinViewer (P ≤ .05) and assigned significantly higher scores for "overall experience"(P ≤ .05). Responses by nurses using VeinViewer overall saw the device in a positive light.
本研究评估了静脉观察仪在儿科血液肿瘤门诊进行外周血管穿刺的有效性。在获得同意后，53名患者被随机分为静脉观察仪组（n = 27）或标准方法组（n = 26）。收集了穿刺尝试次数、操作时间、穿刺并发症以及患者和护士满意度的数据。与标准方法组相比，随机分配到静脉观察仪组的患者静脉穿刺所需时间显著更短（P≤0.05）。此外，这些患者对护士技能的评分显著高于未使用静脉观察仪的护士（P≤0.05），并且对“总体体验”的评分也显著更高（P≤0.05）。总体而言，使用静脉观察仪的护士对该设备持积极态度。
