Aplin L M, Firth J A, Farine D R, Voelkl B, Crates R A, Culina A, Garroway C J, Hinde C A, Kidd L R, Psorakis I, Milligan N D, Radersma R, Verhelst B L, Sheldon B C
Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K. ; Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, CA, U.S.A.
Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.
Anim Behav. 2015 Oct;108:117-127. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.016.
Despite growing interest in animal social networks, surprisingly little is known about whether individuals are consistent in their social network characteristics. Networks are rarely repeatedly sampled; yet an assumption of individual consistency in social behaviour is often made when drawing conclusions about the consequences of social processes and structure. A characterization of such social phenotypes is therefore vital to understanding the significance of social network structure for individual fitness outcomes, and for understanding the evolution and ecology of individual variation in social behaviour more broadly. Here, we measured foraging associations over three winters in a large PIT-tagged population of great tits, and used a range of social network metrics to quantify individual variation in social behaviour. We then examined repeatability in social behaviour over both short (week to week) and long (year to year) timescales, and investigated variation in repeatability across age and sex classes. Social behaviours were significantly repeatable across all timescales, with the highest repeatability observed in group size choice and unweighted degree, a measure of gregariousness. By conducting randomizations to control for the spatial and temporal distribution of individuals, we further show that differences in social phenotypes were not solely explained by within-population variation in local densities, but also reflected fine-scale variation in social decision making. Our results provide rare evidence of stable social phenotypes in a wild population of animals. Such stable social phenotypes can be targets of selection and may have important fitness consequences, both for individuals and for their social-foraging associates.
尽管人们对动物社交网络的兴趣日益浓厚,但令人惊讶的是,对于个体在社交网络特征方面是否具有一致性,我们知之甚少。社交网络很少被重复采样;然而,在得出关于社会过程和结构的后果的结论时,往往会假定个体在社会行为上具有一致性。因此,对这种社会表型进行特征描述对于理解社交网络结构对个体适应性结果的重要性,以及更广泛地理解社会行为中个体变异的进化和生态至关重要。在这里,我们在一个大量佩戴被动集成应答器(PIT)标签的大山雀种群中,测量了三个冬天的觅食关联,并使用一系列社交网络指标来量化社会行为中的个体变异。然后,我们研究了在短时间尺度(周与周之间)和长时间尺度(年与年之间)上社会行为的重复性,并调查了不同年龄和性别类别的重复性差异。在所有时间尺度上,社会行为都具有显著的重复性,在群体规模选择和非加权度(一种群居性的度量)方面观察到最高的重复性。通过进行随机化以控制个体的空间和时间分布,我们进一步表明,社会表型的差异不仅可以由种群内部局部密度的变化来解释,还反映了社会决策中的精细尺度变化。我们的结果为野生动物种群中稳定的社会表型提供了罕见的证据。这种稳定的社会表型可能是选择的目标,并且可能对个体及其社会觅食伙伴产生重要的适应性后果。