Suppr超能文献

为什么患有尿路感染的患者参与或不参与临床试验?一项关于德国家庭医学的定性研究。

Why do - or don't - patients with urinary tract infection participate in a clinical trial? A qualitative study in German family medicine.

作者信息

Bleidorn Jutta, Bucak Sermin, Gágyor Ildikó, Hummers-Pradier Eva, Dierks Marie-Luise

机构信息

Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany.

出版信息

Ger Med Sci. 2015 Oct 14;13:Doc17. doi: 10.3205/000221. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insufficient patient recruitment can impair the conduct of clinical trials substantially, not least because a significant number of eligible patients decline trial participation. Though barriers and motivational factors have been worked out for patients with cancer or chronic diseases, little is known about primary care patients' perceptions towards trial participation when visiting their family practitioner (FP) with acute uncomplicated conditions. This study aims to assess primary care patients' motivation and barriers to participate in trials, and to identify factors that optimize patient recruitment in future trials.

METHODS

This study was embedded in a drug trial comparing two treatment strategies for women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care. Semi-structured telephone interviews both with trial participants and decliners were conducted. The interview guideline focused on patients' personal motivational or hampering factors. Further topics were study theme, FPs' role, randomization, trial procedures, and potential motivational factors or barriers presumed to be relevant for other patients. Transcripts were analyzed by summarizing content analysis.

RESULTS

20 interviews with trial participants and 5 interviews with trial decliners were conducted. RESULTS show various reasons for trial participation from three categories: personal aspects, trial related aspects and patient-physician-relationship. A relevant trial topic and perceived personal benefit promotes participation as well as the wish to support research in general. Additionally, a maximum of safety concerning symptom relief reassures patients significantly. Trust in the FP plays also an important role in the decision process. Trial decliners show strong individual treatment preferences, which, together with individual reasons, lead to trial refusals.

CONCLUSIONS

To optimize recruitment conditions for further clinical trials on acute and common conditions in family medicine, the following key issues should be considered: emphasizing patients' personal benefit, featuring patient relevant trial topics, providing a maximum of safety, keeping effort by trial procedures comfortable.

摘要

背景

患者招募不足会严重影响临床试验的开展,尤其是因为大量符合条件的患者拒绝参与试验。尽管已经针对癌症或慢性病患者找出了障碍因素和促动因素,但对于患有急性非复杂性疾病的初级保健患者在就诊于家庭医生时对参与试验的看法却知之甚少。本研究旨在评估初级保健患者参与试验的动机和障碍,并确定在未来试验中优化患者招募的因素。

方法

本研究嵌入一项药物试验,该试验比较了初级保健中针对患有非复杂性尿路感染的女性的两种治疗策略。对试验参与者和拒绝者都进行了半结构化电话访谈。访谈指南聚焦于患者的个人促动因素或阻碍因素。其他主题包括研究主题、家庭医生的作用、随机分组、试验程序以及假定与其他患者相关的潜在促动因素或障碍。通过总结性内容分析法对访谈记录进行分析。

结果

对20名试验参与者和5名试验拒绝者进行了访谈。结果显示了来自三个类别的参与试验的各种原因:个人方面、试验相关方面以及医患关系。一个相关的试验主题和感知到的个人益处会促进参与,以及总体上支持研究的愿望。此外,关于症状缓解的最大安全性会显著让患者安心。对家庭医生的信任在决策过程中也起着重要作用。试验拒绝者表现出强烈的个人治疗偏好,这些偏好与个人原因一起导致试验拒绝。

结论

为了优化家庭医学中关于急性和常见疾病的进一步临床试验的招募条件,应考虑以下关键问题:强调患者的个人益处、突出与患者相关的试验主题、提供最大安全性、使试验程序的负担保持舒适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d4b/4606084/81de566b0250/GMS-13-17-t-001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验