Sethaphanich Napapailin, Santanirand Pitak, Rattanasiri Sasivimol, Techasaensiri Chonnamet, Chaisavaneeyakorn Sujittra, Apiwattanakul Nopporn
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pediatr Int. 2016 May;58(5):338-46. doi: 10.1111/ped.12845. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
Infection caused by extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in pediatric patients has been increasing and spreading to the community, compromising the options for effective antibiotics. This retrospective study was conducted to identify which antibiotics ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae remain susceptible to. In addition, the prevalence of community-acquired infection caused by these organisms, and the possibility of association between these organisms and septic shock, were explored.
Antibiotic susceptibility of ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from pediatric patients were reviewed to determine the rates of susceptibility to various antibiotics. A chart review was performed to clarify the prevalence of community-acquired infection and the severity.
Of 849 strains analyzed, 40% were ESBL positive. Apart from cephalosporins, ESBL-producing strains were also less likely to be susceptible to other antibiotics, such as quinolones, gentamicin, netilmicin, and cotrimoxazole, more than 90% of which were still susceptible to amikacin, carbapenems, colistin, and tigecycline. Around 20% of community-acquired infections in the present study were caused by ESBL-producing strains. ESBL-producing strains found in the community were more likely to be susceptible to gentamicin, netilmicin, and cefepime than those found in hospital. Infection caused by ESBL-producing strains was not significantly associated with septic shock.
The increase in infection caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae limits the availability of effective antibiotics. Given that carbapenems are necessary for treating serious infections, amikacin, cefepime, and piperacillin/tazobactam are possible options for consolidative therapy or for non-serious infection.
产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的肠杆菌科细菌在儿科患者中引起的感染不断增加,并已蔓延至社区,这使得有效的抗生素选择受到限制。本回顾性研究旨在确定产ESBL的肠杆菌科细菌对哪些抗生素仍敏感。此外,还探讨了这些细菌引起的社区获得性感染的患病率,以及这些细菌与感染性休克之间关联的可能性。
回顾从儿科患者中分离出的产ESBL和不产ESBL的大肠埃希菌及肺炎克雷伯菌菌株的抗生素敏感性,以确定对各种抗生素的敏感率。进行病历审查以明确社区获得性感染的患病率及严重程度。
在分析的849株菌株中,40%为ESBL阳性。除头孢菌素外,产ESBL菌株对其他抗生素(如喹诺酮类、庆大霉素、奈替米星和复方新诺明)的敏感性也较低,其中超过90%的菌株仍对阿米卡星、碳青霉烯类、黏菌素和替加环素敏感。在本研究中,约20%的社区获得性感染由产ESBL菌株引起。在社区中发现的产ESBL菌株比在医院中发现的更易对庆大霉素、奈替米星和头孢吡肟敏感。产ESBL菌株引起的感染与感染性休克无显著关联。
产ESBL的肠杆菌科细菌引起的感染增加限制了有效抗生素的可获得性。鉴于碳青霉烯类对于治疗严重感染是必需的,阿米卡星、头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦可能是巩固治疗或非严重感染的选择。