Avery Robert L, Gordon Gabriel M
California Retina Consultants and Research Foundation, Santa Barbara.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;134(1):21-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4070.
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is commonly used to treat numerous retinal conditions and appears safe, yet controversy remains regarding systemic safety.
To evaluate the systemic safety of intravitreous anti-VEGF injections in high-risk patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and to investigate separately the subgroup of these patients with the highest level of exposure to anti-VEGF monthly treatment for 2 years.
A search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clincaltrials.gov, and ophthalmology congress abstracts January 1, 1947, to May 19, 2015.
Randomized clinical trials were selected that evaluated monthly anti-VEGF injections for DME for 2 years and reported the outcome measures of cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarctions, arteriothrombotic events, and mortality.
Two reviewers collected data independently from each study for the meta-analysis. Data were pooled using a fixed-effects model and analyzed from November 6, 2014, to June 28, 2015. Peto odds ratios with 95% CIs were calculated.
Primary end points included cerebrovascular accidents and all-cause mortality in the highest-dose arms. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarctions, arteriothrombotic events, and vascular-related death.
Of 1126 articles reviewed, 598 were removed as duplicate studies and 524, for lack of monthly treatment data for 2 years, leaving 4 studies for the meta-analysis that met the search criteria: 2 trials using monthly aflibercept and 2 using monthly ranibizumab, representing 1328 patients. The primary evaluation (1078 patients) combined the monthly aflibercept and the 0.5-mg ranibizumab arms and yielded an increased risk for death compared with sham and laser treatments (odds ratio [OR], 2.98; 95% CI, 1.44-6.14; P = .003). Analysis including monthly aflibercept and 0.5-mg ranibizumab yielded an increased risk for cerebrovascular accidents (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.04-5.22; P = .04) and vascular death (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.08-5.82; P = .03). No definitive increased risk for myocardial infarctions and arteriothrombotic events was seen with all dose combinations.
In this meta-analysis of anti-VEGF agents for patients with DME, assessment of the highest-level exposure group (those high-risk patients with DME who received 2 years of monthly treatment) revealed a possible increased risk for death and potentially for cerebrovascular accidents. Consideration of total exposure to anti-VEGF agents when treating those at high risk for vascular disease may be important.
抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)疗法常用于治疗多种视网膜疾病,且似乎是安全的,但关于其全身安全性仍存在争议。
评估玻璃体内注射抗VEGF药物对糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)高危患者的全身安全性,并分别研究这些患者中接受2年每月一次抗VEGF治疗且暴露水平最高的亚组。
检索MEDLINE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、ClinicalTrials.gov以及1947年1月1日至2015年5月19日的眼科大会摘要。
选择评估每月一次抗VEGF注射治疗DME持续2年并报告脑血管意外、心肌梗死、动脉血栓形成事件和死亡率等结局指标的随机临床试验。
两名研究者独立从每项研究中收集数据用于荟萃分析。使用固定效应模型汇总数据,并于2014年11月6日至2015年6月28日进行分析。计算Peto比值比及95%可信区间。
主要终点包括最高剂量组的脑血管意外和全因死亡率。次要结局包括心肌梗死、动脉血栓形成事件和血管相关死亡。
在检索的1126篇文章中,598篇因重复研究被剔除,524篇因缺乏2年每月治疗数据被剔除,最终纳入荟萃分析的符合检索标准的研究有4项:2项使用每月一次阿柏西普的试验和2项使用每月一次雷珠单抗的试验,共1328例患者。主要评估(1078例患者)将每月一次阿柏西普组和0.5mg雷珠单抗组合并,与假手术和激光治疗相比,死亡风险增加(比值比[OR],2.98;95%可信区间,1.44 - 6.14;P = 0.003)。包括每月一次阿柏西普和0.5mg雷珠单抗的分析显示,脑血管意外风险增加(OR,2.33;95%可信区间,1.04 -