Nakamura Kei
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2015;117(1):34-41.
The author discusses how Morita therapy is used to treat depression, illustrated with a clinical case, and makes comparisons between Morita therapy and behavioral activation (BA). The author further examines the issue of when and how to encourage patients to join activities in clinical practice in Japan. Both Morita therapy and BA share at least a common view that it is effective to activate patients' constructive behavior at a certain point in depression treatment. However, BA therapists, compared to Morita therapists, seem to pay less attention to the necessity of resting and the appropriate timing for introducing behavioral activation. There may be some contextual differences between depressive patients in Japan and those in North America. In the case of Japanese patients, exhaustion from overwork is often considered a factor triggering the development of depression. At the same time, the Morita-based pathogenic model of depression seems different from BA's model of the same disorder. BA's approach to understanding depression may be considered a psychological (behavioristic) model. In this model, the cause of depression lies in: (a) a lack of positive reinforcement, and (b) negative reinforcement resulting from avoidance of the experience of discomfort. Therefore, the basic strategy of BA is to release depressive patients from an avoidant lifestyle, which serves as a basis for negative reinforcement, and to redirect the patients toward activities which offer the experience of positive reinforcement BA is primarily practiced by clinical psychologists in the U. S. while psychiatrists prescribe medication as a medical service. On the other hand, the clinical practice of treating depression in Japan is based primarily on medical models of depression. This is also true of Morita therapy, but in a broad sense. While those who follow medical models in a narrow sense try to identify the cause of illness and then remove it, Morita therapists pay more attention to the recovery process rather than the pathogeneses of depression, and attempt to foster patients' natural healing power and resilience. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to refer to the model used in Morita therapy as "a health-recovery model." Moreover, the Moritian model of depression partially incorporates a psychological model because patients' dogmatic thinking (e. g., perfectionistic self-expectations and high demands on self) is regarded as a factor hindering their recovery, which Morita therapists try to modify. In conclusion, it is recommended that we reconsider the importance of incorporating psychological help which is compatible with the initial treatment principle based on resting and pharmacotherapy in clinical practice in Japan.
作者讨论了森田疗法如何用于治疗抑郁症,并结合一个临床案例进行说明,还对森田疗法与行为激活疗法(BA)进行了比较。作者进一步探讨了在日本临床实践中何时以及如何鼓励患者参与活动的问题。森田疗法和行为激活疗法至少有一个共同观点,即在抑郁症治疗的某个阶段激活患者的建设性行为是有效的。然而,与森田疗法治疗师相比,行为激活疗法治疗师似乎不太关注休息的必要性以及引入行为激活的适当时间。日本的抑郁症患者与北美的抑郁症患者可能存在一些背景差异。就日本患者而言,过度劳累导致的疲惫常被视为引发抑郁症的一个因素。同时,基于森田疗法的抑郁症致病模型似乎与行为激活疗法对同一疾病的模型不同。行为激活疗法理解抑郁症的方法可被视为一种心理学(行为主义)模型。在这个模型中,抑郁症的成因在于:(a)缺乏积极强化,以及(b)因避免不适体验而产生的消极强化。因此,行为激活疗法的基本策略是让抑郁症患者摆脱作为消极强化基础的回避型生活方式,并引导患者转向能提供积极强化体验的活动。行为激活疗法主要由美国的临床心理学家实施,而精神科医生则提供药物治疗服务。另一方面,日本治疗抑郁症的临床实践主要基于抑郁症的医学模型。森田疗法也是如此,但从广义上来说。狭义上遵循医学模型的人试图找出病因然后消除它,而森田疗法治疗师更关注康复过程而非抑郁症的发病机制,并试图培养患者的自然治愈力和恢复力。因此,将森田疗法中使用的模型称为“健康恢复模型”可能更合适。此外,森田疗法的抑郁症模型部分纳入了心理学模型,因为患者的教条式思维(例如,完美主义的自我期望和对自己的高要求)被视为阻碍他们康复的一个因素,森田疗法治疗师试图对其进行调整。总之,建议我们重新审视在日本临床实践中纳入与基于休息和药物治疗的初始治疗原则相兼容的心理帮助的重要性。