• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种安慰剂干粉吸入器在慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人患者中的偏好性研究:ELLIPTA®干粉吸入器与DISKUS®干粉吸入器对比

A Preference Study of Two Placebo Dry Powder Inhalers in Adults with COPD: ELLIPTA® Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) versus DISKUS® DPI.

作者信息

Yun Kirby Suyong, Zhu Chang-Qing, Kerwin Edward M, Stanford Richard H, Georges George

机构信息

a 1 GSK, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA.

b 2 GSK, Uxbridge , Middlesex , United Kingdom.

出版信息

COPD. 2016;13(2):167-75. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2015.1057274. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

DOI:10.3109/15412555.2015.1057274
PMID:26516724
Abstract

Patients' preference is an important factor in selecting an inhaler treatment for COPD. The DISKUS® dry powder inhaler (DPI), which has been available to deliver several COPD medications for a decade, and the ELLIPTA® DPI, developed for the delivery of newer once-daily medications for patients with COPD, were studied in terms of patient preference and inhaler-specific attributes. We conducted a randomized, open-label, crossover study in patients with COPD. Patients used placebo ELLIPTA DPI once daily and placebo DISKUS DPI twice daily, for ∼1 week each, while continuing their COPD medications. Endpoints were: inhaler preference based on size of the numbers on the dose-counter (primary); the number of steps needed and inhaler size (secondary); and based on comfort of the mouthpiece, ease of opening, overall preference, and dosing regimen preference ('other'). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs). A total of 287 patients were randomized. A significantly (p < 0.001) larger proportion of patients preferred the ELLIPTA DPI over DISKUS DPI for each of the tested attributes and overall, and preferred once-daily over twice-daily dosing. AEs were reported for 36 patients (13%); one (dry mouth) was considered to be related to the placebo-containing DISKUS DPI. Three patients had five non-fatal serious AEs, none were deemed inhaler-related. This study demonstrated that more patients with COPD preferred five specific inhaler attributes of the ELLIPTA DPI over DISKUS DPI and overall, and preferred once-daily versus twice-daily dosing. Safety profiles were consistent with those expected for COPD.

摘要

患者偏好是为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)选择吸入器治疗的一个重要因素。已上市十年用于递送多种COPD药物的都保®(DISKUS®)干粉吸入器(DPI),以及为向COPD患者递送新型每日一次药物而研发的易纳器®(ELLIPTA®)DPI,就患者偏好和吸入器特定属性进行了研究。我们对COPD患者开展了一项随机、开放标签、交叉研究。患者每天使用一次安慰剂易纳器DPI,每天使用两次安慰剂都保DPI,每次约1周,同时继续服用其COPD药物。终点指标为:基于剂量计数器上数字大小的吸入器偏好(主要指标);所需步骤数和吸入器尺寸(次要指标);以及基于吸嘴舒适度、开启难易程度、总体偏好和给药方案偏好(“其他”)。安全性评估包括不良事件(AE)。共有287例患者被随机分组。对于每个测试属性以及总体而言,明显更多比例的患者(p < 0.001)更喜欢易纳器DPI而非都保DPI,并且更喜欢每日一次给药而非每日两次给药。36例患者(13%)报告了AE;其中1例(口干)被认为与含安慰剂的都保DPI有关。3例患者发生了5起非致命严重AE,均未被认为与吸入器相关。这项研究表明,更多COPD患者在五个特定吸入器属性方面更喜欢易纳器DPI而非都保DPI,并且总体上更喜欢每日一次给药而非每日两次给药。安全性特征与COPD预期的特征一致。

相似文献

1
A Preference Study of Two Placebo Dry Powder Inhalers in Adults with COPD: ELLIPTA® Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) versus DISKUS® DPI.两种安慰剂干粉吸入器在慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人患者中的偏好性研究:ELLIPTA®干粉吸入器与DISKUS®干粉吸入器对比
COPD. 2016;13(2):167-75. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2015.1057274. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
2
A randomized, open-label, single-visit, crossover study simulating triple-drug delivery with Ellipta compared with dual inhaler combinations in patients with COPD.一项随机、开放标签、单次就诊、交叉研究,在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中模拟使用Ellipta进行三联药物递送并与双吸入器组合进行比较。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Aug 21;13:2515-2523. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S169060. eCollection 2018.
3
The ELLIPTA® Dry Powder Inhaler: Design, Functionality, In Vitro Dosing Performance and Critical Task Compliance by Patients and Caregivers.ELLIPTA®干粉吸入器:设计、功能、体外给药性能以及患者和护理人员的关键任务依从性
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015 Dec;28(6):474-85. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1223. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
4
Qualitative assessment of attributes and ease of use of the ELLIPTA™ dry powder inhaler for delivery of maintenance therapy for asthma and COPD.哮喘和 COPD 维持治疗用 ELLIPTA™干粉吸入器的属性和易用性的定性评估。
BMC Pulm Med. 2013 Dec 7;13:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-13-72.
5
Ease-of-use preference for the ELLIPTA® dry powder inhaler over a commonly used single-dose capsule dry powder inhaler by inhalation device-naïve Japanese volunteers aged 40 years or older.40 岁或以上、初次使用吸入装置的日本志愿者对 ELLIPTA®干粉吸入器相对于常用单剂量胶囊干粉吸入器的使用偏好。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Dec 11;9:1365-75. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S72762. eCollection 2014.
6
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the ELLIPTA and HandiHaler Dry Powder Inhalers in Patients With COPD: Inhaler-Specific Attributes and Overall Patient Preference.一项比较ELLIPTA和HandiHaler干粉吸入器用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的随机临床试验:吸入器特定属性及患者总体偏好
COPD. 2018 Feb;15(1):46-50. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2017.1400000. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
7
Effect of Disease Severity in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Inhaler-Specific Inhalation Profiles Through the ELLIPTA® Dry Powder Inhaler.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疾病严重程度对通过ELLIPTA®干粉吸入器的特定吸入器吸入特征的影响。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015 Dec;28(6):486-97. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1224. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
Correct usage, ease of use, and preference of two dry powder inhalers in patients with COPD: analysis of five phase III, randomized trials.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者对两种干粉吸入器的正确使用、易用性及偏好:五项III期随机试验分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Aug 16;11:1873-80. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S109121. eCollection 2016.
9
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol delivered as a combination dry powder from a capsule-based inhaler and a multidose inhaler in asthma and COPD patients.丙酸氟替卡松和沙美特罗联合干粉吸入剂(胶囊型和多剂量型)在哮喘和 COPD 患者中的药代动力学和药效学。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2014 Aug;27(4):279-89. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2013.1040. Epub 2013 Sep 28.
10
A randomised open-label cross-over study of inhaler errors, preference and time to achieve correct inhaler use in patients with COPD or asthma: comparison of ELLIPTA with other inhaler devices.一项比较 Ellipta 与其他吸入器设备的在 COPD 或哮喘患者中发生的吸入器错误、偏好以及达到正确使用吸入器时间的随机、开放标签、交叉研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Nov 24;26:16079. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.79.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vitro Comparison of Two Blister-Type Inhalers.两种泡罩型吸入器的体外比较。
Respir Care. 2023 Mar;68(3):338-345. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09883. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
2
Comparison of Two pMDIs in Adult Asthmatics: A Randomized Double-Blind Double-Dummy Clinical Trial.两种定量吸入器在成年哮喘患者中的比较:一项随机双盲双模拟临床试验
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2022 Jan;85(1):25-36. doi: 10.4046/trd.2021.0093. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
3
Evaluating the Impact and Benefits of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol in Individuals with Asthma or COPD: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Patient Experiences.
评估糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗在哮喘或 COPD 患者中的影响和获益:基于患者体验的混合方法分析。
Adv Ther. 2018 Sep;35(9):1378-1399. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0760-7. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
4
Patient considerations in the treatment of COPD: focus on the new combination inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol.慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗中的患者考量:聚焦新型吸入剂糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Jun 8;12:993-1001. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S152179. eCollection 2018.
5
Spotlight on fluticasone furoate/vilanterol trifenatate for the once-daily treatment of asthma: design, development and place in therapy.糠酸氟替卡松/三苯乙酸维兰特罗每日一次治疗哮喘的聚焦:设计、研发及在治疗中的地位
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Dec 14;10:4047-4060. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S113573. eCollection 2016.