Kociolek Larry K, Patel Sameer J, Zheng Xiaotian, Todd Kathleen M, Shulman Stanford T, Gerding Dale N
From the *Division of Infectious Diseases, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago; Departments of †Pediatrics and ‡Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; §Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago; ¶Division of Infectious Diseases, Edward Hines, Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Chicago, Illinois; ‖Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Feb;35(2):157-61. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000954.
Most children with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) experience community onset of CDI symptoms.
We retrospectively compared hospital-onset healthcare facility-associated CDI cases to community-associated (CA) CDI cases diagnosed by Cepheid Xpert tcdB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at an academic children's hospital over a 1-year period. Saved stools from CDI cases additionally underwent anaerobic stool culture and multiplex gastrointestinal pathogen PCR testing.
Compared with 25 hospital-onset healthcare facility-associated CDI cases, the 74 CA-CDI cases were more frequently <2 years old (18% vs. 0%, P = 0.034) and less frequently had antibiotic exposure in the past 30 days (26% vs. 88%, P < 0.0001), proton pump inhibitor exposure (16% vs. 36%, P = 0.036) or a gastrostomy tube (11% vs. 32%, P = 0.013). Among children diagnosed with CA-CDI, 19 (26%) had no identified CDI risk factors (immunocompromised; gastrostomy tube; recent antibiotic, proton pump inhibitor or inpatient/outpatient healthcare exposures). Clinical testing for viral pathogens was uncommon among children thought to have CA-CDI. Multiplex PCR testing of saved stool samples failed to identify C. difficile among 23% of cases diagnosed with CA-CDI by the Cepheid Xpert tcdB PCR assay. CDI antibiotic therapy was provided to nearly all patients testing positive by tcdB PCR irrespective of CDI risk factors.
Many children diagnosed with CA-CDI by PCR lack CDI risk factors and have discordant results when additional CDI testing methods are performed, suggesting overdiagnosis of CDI in children with community-onset diarrhea. More selective CDI testing of low-risk pediatric patients is needed to more accurately diagnose CDI and limit unnecessary CDI antibiotic treatment in children.
大多数艰难梭菌感染(CDI)患儿的CDI症状始于社区。
我们回顾性比较了在一家学术儿童医院1年期间通过赛沛Xpert tcdB聚合酶链反应(PCR)诊断的医院获得性医疗机构相关CDI病例与社区相关(CA)CDI病例。CDI病例保存的粪便样本还进行了厌氧粪便培养和多重胃肠道病原体PCR检测。
与25例医院获得性医疗机构相关CDI病例相比,74例CA-CDI病例年龄<2岁的比例更高(18%对0%,P = 0.034),过去30天内使用抗生素的比例更低(26%对88%,P < 0.0001),使用质子泵抑制剂的比例更低(16%对36%),P = 0.036),或有胃造瘘管的比例更低(11%对32%,P = 0.013)。在诊断为CA-CDI的儿童中,19例(26%)没有确定的CDI危险因素(免疫功能低下;胃造瘘管;近期使用抗生素、质子泵抑制剂或住院/门诊医疗暴露)。在认为患有CA-CDI的儿童中,对病毒病原体进行临床检测并不常见。通过赛沛Xpert tcdB PCR检测诊断为CA-CDI的病例中,23%的病例保存粪便样本的多重PCR检测未能鉴定出艰难梭菌。无论CDI危险因素如何,几乎所有通过tcdB PCR检测呈阳性的患者都接受了CDI抗生素治疗。
许多通过PCR诊断为CA-CDI的儿童缺乏CDI危险因素,当采用其他CDI检测方法时结果不一致,这表明社区发病腹泻儿童中存在CDI过度诊断的情况。需要对低风险儿科患者进行更有选择性的CDI检测,以更准确地诊断CDI并限制儿童不必要的CDI抗生素治疗。