Suppr超能文献

创伤性气道的处理。

Management of the Traumatized Airway.

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Alameda Health System, Oakland, California (U.J.); Divisions of Trauma Anesthesiology and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland (M.M.); Department of Anesthesiology, Metrohealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (C.E.S.); and Department of Anesthesiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama (J.-F.P.).

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan;124(1):199-206. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000903.

Abstract

There is a lack of evidence-based approach regarding the best practice for airway management in patients with a traumatized airway. General recommendations for the management of the traumatized airway are summarized in table 5. Airway trauma may not be readily apparent, and its evaluation requires a high level of suspicion for airway disruption and compression. For patients with facial trauma, control of the airway may be significantly impacted by edema, bleeding, inability to clear secretions, loss of bony support, and difficulty with face mask ventilation. With the airway compression from neck swelling or hematoma, intubation attempts can further compromise the airway due to expanding hematoma. For patients with airway disruption, the goal is to pass the tube across the injured area without disrupting it or to insert the airway distal to the injury using a surgical approach. If airway injury is extensive, a surgical airway distal to the site of injury may be the best initial approach. Alternatively, if orotracheal intubation is chosen, spontaneous ventilation may be maintained or RSI may be performed. RSI is a common approach. Thus, some of the patients intubated may subsequently require tracheostomy. A stable patient with limited injuries may not require intubation but should be watched carefully for at least several hours. Because of a paucity of evidence-based data, the choice between these approaches and the techniques utilized is a clinical decision depending on the patient's condition, clinical setting, injuries to airway and other organs, and available personnel, expertise, and equipment. Inability to obtain a definitive airway is always an absolute indication for an emergency cricothyroidotomy or surgical tracheostomy.

摘要

对于创伤性气道患者的气道管理,目前缺乏循证医学方法。表 5 总结了创伤性气道管理的一般建议。气道创伤可能不易察觉,其评估需要高度怀疑气道中断和受压。对于面部创伤患者,气道的控制可能会受到严重影响,原因包括水肿、出血、无法清除分泌物、骨支撑丧失以及面罩通气困难。由于颈部肿胀或血肿导致气道受压,插管尝试会因血肿扩大而进一步损害气道。对于气道中断的患者,目标是将管子穿过受伤区域而不使其中断,或者使用手术方法将气道插入到损伤部位的远端。如果气道损伤广泛,可能需要在损伤部位远端进行手术气道。或者,如果选择经口气管插管,可能需要维持自主通气或进行 RSI。RSI 是一种常见的方法。因此,一些接受插管的患者可能随后需要进行气管造口术。对于损伤有限的稳定患者,可能不需要插管,但应密切观察至少数小时。由于缺乏基于证据的数据,这些方法和技术的选择是一个临床决策,取决于患者的病情、临床环境、气道和其他器官的损伤以及可用的人员、专业知识和设备。无法获得明确的气道始终是紧急环甲切开术或手术气管切开术的绝对指征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验