Trinkley Katy E, Van Matre Edward T, Mueller Scott W, Page Robert L, Nair Kavita
1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado's Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA.
2 University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Pharm Pract. 2017 Feb;30(1):115-120. doi: 10.1177/0897190015614478. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
Ensuring a culture that prioritizes and implements patient safety requires educating all future health care professionals to prepare them for their active role in reducing medical errors. There is limited literature describing integration of patient safety education into the curriculum of health care professionals, including pharmacists. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived benefit of integrating patient safety education into a pharmacy curriculum.
Second-year pharmacy students (P2s) completed a patient safety self-study, followed by in-class and experiential application of a root cause analysis (RCA). An electronic, anonymous postsurvey was administered to P2s and third-year pharmacy students (P3s) who had not had formal patient safety education.
Of the 310 students, 53% responded to the survey. Significantly more P2s reported more confidence to describe patient safety and its purpose ( P = .0092), describe factors that influence patient safety ( P = .0055), and conduct an RCA ( P < .001). P2s also reported significantly better ability to conduct a RCA compared to P3s (88.9% positive vs 58.7%, respectively; P ≤ .001).
Both classes perceived patient safety education to be valuable; however, formal education resulted in some significant improvements in perceived confidence and understanding, including ability to conduct an RCA.
要确保营造一种重视并实施患者安全的文化,就需要对所有未来的医疗保健专业人员进行教育,使他们为在减少医疗差错方面发挥积极作用做好准备。关于将患者安全教育融入医疗保健专业人员(包括药剂师)课程的文献有限。本研究的目的是评估将患者安全教育融入药学课程的感知益处。
二年级药学专业学生(P2)完成了一次患者安全自学,随后进行了课堂及根本原因分析(RCA)的实践应用。对未接受过正规患者安全教育的P2和三年级药学专业学生(P3)进行了电子匿名问卷调查。
在310名学生中,53%对调查做出了回应。显著更多的P2表示更有信心描述患者安全及其目的(P = 0.0092)、描述影响患者安全的因素(P = 0.0055)以及进行根本原因分析(P < 0.001)。与P3相比,P2进行根本原因分析的能力也显著更强(分别为88.9%和58.7%;P ≤ 0.001)。
两个班级都认为患者安全教育很有价值;然而,正规教育在感知信心和理解方面带来了一些显著改善,包括进行根本原因分析的能力。