King-Morris Kelli R, Deger Serpil Muge, Hung Adriana M, Egbert Phyllis Ann, Ellis Charles D, Graves Amy, Shintani Ayumi, Ikizler T Alp
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA Veterans Administration Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Perit Dial Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):433-41. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00296. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
♦
Insulin resistance (IR) is common in maintenance dialysis patients and is associated with excess mortality. Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp (HEGC) is the gold standard for measuring IR. There are limited studies using HEGC for comparison to other indirect indices of IR in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, nor have there been direct comparisons between patients receiving PD and those on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) with regard to severity of IR, methods of measurement, or factors associated with the development of IR. ♦
This is a cross-sectional, single-center study performed in 10 prevalent PD patients of median age 48 years (range 41 - 54); 50% were female and 60% were African American. Insulin resistance was assessed by HEGC (glucose disposal rate [GDR]), homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR), HOMA-IR corrected by adiponectin (HOMA-AD), leptin adiponectin ratio (LAR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), McAuley's index, and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at each time point for a total of 18 studies. Retrospective analysis compared this cohort to 12 hemodialysis patients who had previously undergone similar testing. ♦
The median GDR was 6.4 mg/kg/min (interquartile range [IQR] 6.0, 7.8) in the PD cohort compared with the MHD group, which was 5.7 mg/kg/min (IQR 4.3, 6.6). For both the PD and MHD cohorts, the best predictors of GDR by HEGC after adjusting for age, gender, and body mass index (BMI), were HOMA-AD (PD: r = -0.69, p = 0.01; MHD: r = -0.78, p = 0.03) and LAR (PD: r = -0.68, p < 0.001; MHD: r = -0.65, p = 0.04). In both groups, HOMA-IR and QUICKI failed to have strong predictive value. Eight of 10 PD patients had at least 1 abnormal OGTT, demonstrating impaired glucose tolerance. ♦
Insulin resistance is highly prevalent in PD patients. The adipokine based formulas, HOMA-AD and LAR, correlated well in both the PD and MHD populations in predicting GDR by HEGC, outperforming HOMA-IR. The use of these novel markers could be considered for large-scale, epidemiological outcome studies.
♦
胰岛素抵抗(IR)在维持性透析患者中很常见,且与过高的死亡率相关。高胰岛素正葡萄糖钳夹技术(HEGC)是测量IR的金标准。关于使用HEGC与腹膜透析(PD)患者IR的其他间接指标进行比较的研究有限,在IR严重程度、测量方法或与IR发生相关的因素方面,也没有对接受PD治疗的患者和维持性血液透析(MHD)患者进行直接比较。♦
这是一项横断面、单中心研究,对10例年龄中位数为48岁(范围41 - 54岁)的PD患者进行;50%为女性,60%为非裔美国人。通过HEGC(葡萄糖处置率[GDR])、IR的稳态模型评估(HOMA - IR)、经脂联素校正的HOMA - IR(HOMA - AD)、瘦素脂联素比值(LAR)、定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI)、麦考利指数以及在每个时间点进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)来评估胰岛素抵抗,共进行18项研究。回顾性分析将该队列与12例先前接受过类似检测的血液透析患者进行比较。♦
PD队列的GDR中位数为6.4mg/kg/min(四分位间距[IQR]6.0,7.8),而MHD组为5.7mg/kg/min(IQR 4.3,6.6)。对于PD和MHD队列,在调整年龄、性别和体重指数(BMI)后,通过HEGC预测GDR的最佳指标是HOMA - AD(PD:r = -0.69,p = 0.01;MHD:r = -0.78,p = 0.03)和LAR(PD:r = -0.68,p < 0.001;MHD:r = -0.65,p = 0.04)。在两组中,HOMA - IR和QUICKI均未显示出强大的预测价值。10例PD患者中有8例至少有1次OGTT异常,表明糖耐量受损。♦
胰岛素抵抗在PD患者中非常普遍。基于脂肪因子的公式HOMA - AD和LAR在PD和MHD人群中预测HEGC的GDR方面相关性良好,优于HOMA - IR。在大规模流行病学结局研究中可考虑使用这些新标志物。