• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与式研究的经验:肿瘤学员工对参与工作场所研究的看法。

The experience of participatory research: Perceptions of oncology employees participating in a workplace study.

作者信息

Sale Joanna E M

机构信息

McMaster University ; Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre.

出版信息

Qual Quant. 2006 Dec;40(6):1037-53. doi: 10.1007/s11135-005-3957-1.

DOI:10.1007/s11135-005-3957-1
PMID:26526288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4623760/
Abstract

Participatory research, a concept developed in the Third World, has been increasingly applied to community and health research in developed countries. However, little is known about attitudes to the participatory process in the context of workplace research, especially that carried out in health care settings. In this qualitative study, employees participating in a quality of work-life (QWL) project at a Canadian cancer centre were asked about their perceptions of the participatory research process. Using a phenomenological approach, the author interviewed 12 employees. The following themes emerged from the analysis of interview data: 1) The role of management and senior management was viewed as being important but employees were uncomfortable with the presence of management at meetings; 2) The desired composition of the committee was more complex than ensuring representation from workers and there may have been a natural process by which this composition was attained; 3) Participatory research without action was unacceptable; and 4) Full participation in all aspects of the project was difficult to achieve. These findings have important implications because they challenge some existing notions in the literature about participatory research. Recommendations regarding trust issues, membership recruitment, and the role of members in the participatory process are outlined.

摘要

参与式研究是在第三世界发展起来的一个概念,如今已越来越多地应用于发达国家的社区和健康研究。然而,对于工作场所研究背景下对参与过程的态度,尤其是在医疗保健环境中进行的研究,人们了解甚少。在这项定性研究中,参与加拿大一家癌症中心工作生活质量(QWL)项目的员工被问及他们对参与式研究过程的看法。作者采用现象学方法采访了12名员工。从访谈数据分析中出现了以下主题:1)管理层和高级管理层的角色被视为很重要,但员工对管理层出席会议感到不自在;2)委员会的理想组成比确保工人代表更复杂,而且可能存在一种达成这种组成的自然过程;3)没有行动的参与式研究是不可接受的;4)全面参与项目的各个方面很难实现。这些发现具有重要意义,因为它们挑战了文献中关于参与式研究的一些现有观念。文中概述了关于信任问题、成员招募以及成员在参与过程中的角色的建议。

相似文献

1
The experience of participatory research: Perceptions of oncology employees participating in a workplace study.参与式研究的经验:肿瘤学员工对参与工作场所研究的看法。
Qual Quant. 2006 Dec;40(6):1037-53. doi: 10.1007/s11135-005-3957-1.
2
A qualitative process evaluation of community-based participatory research and human-centered design in the 'Let's talk about vaccines' approach in Mozambique and Malawi.对莫桑比克和马拉维“让我们谈谈疫苗”方法中基于社区的参与式研究和以人为本设计的定性过程评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Feb 21;11(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00677-4.
3
Perceptions of a Quality of Work-Life Survey from the Perspective of Employees in a Canadian Cancer Centre.从加拿大癌症中心员工视角看工作生活质量调查的认知
Qual Quant. 2007;44:779-91. doi: 10.1007/s11135-006-9025-7.
4
Oncology employees valued patient-oriented research over quality of work-life research: a qualitative study.肿瘤学领域员工重视以患者为导向的研究而非工作生活质量研究:一项定性研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):471-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.003. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
5
6
Participatory action research, mixed methods, and research teams: learning from philosophically juxtaposed methodologies for optimal research outcomes.参与行动研究、混合方法和研究团队:从哲学上并置的方法中学习,以获得最佳的研究结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0636-1.
7
A return to lived experiencers themselves: Participatory action research of and by psychosocial clubhouse members.回归到有实际经历的人自身:心理社会俱乐部成员参与的行动研究及由他们开展的行动研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:962137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962137. eCollection 2022.
8
Preferences and Perceptions of Workplace Participation: A Cross-Cultural Study.职场参与的偏好与认知:一项跨文化研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 14;13:806481. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806481. eCollection 2022.
9
Understanding the evolution of trust in a participatory health research partnership: A qualitative study.理解参与式健康研究伙伴关系中信任的演变:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13918. doi: 10.1111/hex.13918. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
10
Evaluating the participatory process in a community-based heart health project.评估一个基于社区的心脏健康项目中的参与过程。
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Oct;55(7):1173-87. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00247-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Grassroots ergonomics: initiating an ergonomics program utilizing participatory techniques.基层工效学:运用参与式技术启动工效学计划。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2001 Jun;45(4):283-9.
2
Stress prevention in bus drivers: evaluation of 13 natural experiments.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Jan;5(1):11-31. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.5.1.11.
3
Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health.基于社区的研究综述:评估改善公众健康的伙伴关系方法。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173.
4
Implementing participatory ergonomics teams among health care workers.
Am J Ind Med. 1997 Sep;32(3):190-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199709)32:3<190::aid-ajim2>3.0.co;2-1.
5
What is participatory research?什么是参与式研究?
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Dec;41(12):1667-76. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-s.
6
Worker participation in occupational health research: theory and practice.工人参与职业健康研究:理论与实践。
Int J Health Serv. 1987;17(1):151-67. doi: 10.2190/FPWF-C2ET-Q4DB-NMNQ.
7
An action research approach to workplace health: integrating methods.一种针对职场健康的行动研究方法:整合多种方法。
Health Educ Q. 1992 Spring;19(1):55-76. doi: 10.1177/109019819201900105.