• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经病学“明智选择”推荐:已有74条且数量不断增加。

Neurology Choosing Wisely recommendations: 74 and growing.

作者信息

Callaghan Brian C, De Lott Lindsey B, Kerber Kevin A, Burke James F, Skolarus Lesli E

机构信息

Health Services Research Program (BCC, LDL, KAK, JFB, LES), Department of Neurology, University of Michigan; and VA Center for Clinical Management Research (BCC, JFB), Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Neurol Clin Pract. 2015 Oct;5(5):439-447. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000189.

DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000189
PMID:26526342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4610317/
Abstract

To increase neurologist awareness and inform future efficiency efforts, we identified all neurology-related Choosing Wisely items. Items were categorized by neurologic specialty, disease/symptom, and test/treatment. Of 370 items provided by 65 medical societies, 74 (20%) items were relevant to neurologists. Twelve were duplicated by multiple societies. Items pertaining to 10 neurologic subspecialties were identified, but none for movement disorders and neuromuscular disease. While many recommendations question the use of imaging, few address other high-cost neurologic tests such as EMG/nerve conduction studies and EEG. A rapidly growing number of neurology-related Choosing Wisely recommendations exist including areas of consensus and areas with few recommendations despite high costs. Consensus items should be prioritized for near-term interventions, while areas with few recommendations represent opportunities for future research.

摘要

为提高神经科医生的认识并为未来的效率提升工作提供信息,我们确定了所有与神经科相关的明智选择项目。这些项目按神经科专业、疾病/症状以及检查/治疗进行分类。在65个医学协会提供的370个项目中,74个(20%)项目与神经科医生相关。有12个项目被多个协会重复提及。确定了与10个神经科亚专业相关的项目,但未涉及运动障碍和神经肌肉疾病方面的项目。虽然许多建议对影像学检查的使用提出质疑,但很少有建议涉及其他高成本的神经科检查,如肌电图/神经传导研究和脑电图。与神经科相关的明智选择建议数量正在迅速增加,包括达成共识的领域以及尽管成本高昂但建议较少的领域。对于近期干预措施,应优先考虑达成共识的项目,而建议较少的领域则为未来研究提供了机会。

相似文献

1
Neurology Choosing Wisely recommendations: 74 and growing.神经病学“明智选择”推荐:已有74条且数量不断增加。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2015 Oct;5(5):439-447. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000189.
2
A Broader View of Quality: Choosing Wisely Recommendations From Other Specialties With High Relevance to Emergency Care.更广义的质量观:选择明智——与急诊护理高度相关的其他专业的推荐意见。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;72(3):246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.06.041.
3
Choosing Wisely in Critical Care: Results of a National Survey From the Critical Care Societies Collaborative.明智选择在重症监护:来自重症监护学会协作组的全国性调查结果。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):331-336. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003496.
4
Choosing Wisely: highest-cost tests in outpatient neurology.明智选择:门诊神经科最昂贵的检查。
Ann Neurol. 2013 May;73(5):679-83. doi: 10.1002/ana.23865. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
5
Longitudinal Content Analysis of the Characteristics and Expected Impact of Low-Value Services Identified in US Choosing Wisely Recommendations.美国明智选择推荐中低价值服务的特征和预期影响的纵向内容分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Feb 1;182(2):127-133. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6911.
6
Choosing Wisely in Emergency Medicine: A National Survey of Emergency Medicine Academic Chairs and Division Chiefs.急诊医学中的明智选择:一项针对急诊医学学术主任和科室主任的全国性调查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;22(12):1506-10. doi: 10.1111/acem.12821. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
7
Do choosing wisely recommendations about low-value care target income-generating treatments provided by members? A content analysis of 1293 recommendations.选择明智的低价值医疗建议是否针对成员提供的创收治疗?对 1293 条建议的内容分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):707. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4576-1.
8
An official American Thoracic Society/American Association of Critical-Care Nurses/American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine policy statement: the Choosing Wisely® Top 5 list in Critical Care Medicine.美国胸科学会/美国危重病护理护士协会/美国胸科医师学会/危重病医学会官方政策声明:危重病医学中的明智选择® 前 5 名列表。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Oct 1;190(7):818-26. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201407-1317ST.
9
AANEM Choosing Wisely - second list.美国神经病学学会“明智选择”——第二清单。
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Feb;57(2):335-336. doi: 10.1002/mus.26002. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
10
Five common errors to avoid in clinical practice: the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO) Choosing Wisely Campaign.避免临床实践中常见的 5 个错误:意大利医院胃肠病学家和内镜医师协会(AIGO)明智选择活动。
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;14(2):301-308. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1992-x. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical Examination Is Predictive of Cauda Equina Syndrome: MRI to Rule Out Diagnosis Is Unnecessary.体格检查可预测马尾综合征:无需MRI排除诊断。
Global Spine J. 2022 Mar;12(2):209-214. doi: 10.1177/2192568220948804. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
2
Patient engagement and shared decision-making: What do they look like in neurology practice?患者参与和共同决策:在神经科实践中它们是什么样的?
Neurol Clin Pract. 2016 Apr;6(2):190-197. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000240.

本文引用的文献

1
Headache neuroimaging: Routine testing when guidelines recommend against them.头痛的神经影像学检查:在指南不推荐时进行常规检测。
Cephalalgia. 2015 Nov;35(13):1144-52. doi: 10.1177/0333102415572918. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
2
Trends in the ambulatory management of headache: analysis of NAMCS and NHAMCS data 1999-2010.头痛门诊管理的趋势:1999 - 2010年国家门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)和国家医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)数据分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):548-55. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3107-3. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
3
How neurologists can choose (even more) wisely: prioritizing waste reduction targets and identifying gaps in knowledge.神经科医生如何更明智地做出选择:确定减少浪费的目标并找出知识差距。
JAMA. 2014;311(16):1607-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1021.
4
Headaches and neuroimaging: high utilization and costs despite guidelines.头痛与神经影像学检查:尽管有指南,但使用率高且费用高昂。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):819-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.173.
5
Worsening trends in the management and treatment of back pain.背痛管理和治疗的恶化趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Sep 23;173(17):1573-81. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8992.
6
Choosing Wisely: highest-cost tests in outpatient neurology.明智选择:门诊神经科最昂贵的检查。
Ann Neurol. 2013 May;73(5):679-83. doi: 10.1002/ana.23865. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
7
The American Academy of Neurology's top five choosing wisely recommendations.美国神经病学学会的五大明智选择建议。
Neurology. 2013 Sep 10;81(11):1004-11. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828aab14. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
8
Application of “less is more” to low back pain.“少即是多”原则在腰痛治疗中的应用。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jul 9;172(13):1016-20. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1838.
9
Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society.腰痛的诊断与治疗:美国医师学会和美国疼痛协会联合临床实践指南
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):478-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006.
10
Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.实践参数:偏头痛循证指南(循证综述)[已退休]:美国神经病学学会质量标准小组委员会报告
Neurology. 2000 Sep 26;55(6):754-62. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.6.754.