Pineda Andrés M, Chandra Ramesh, Gowani Saqib A, Santana Orlando, Mihos Christos G, Kirtane Ajay J, Stone Gregg W, Kurlansky Paul, Smith Craig R, Beohar Nirat
Columbia University Division of Cardiology at the Mount Sinai Heart Institute, Miami Beach, Florida.
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;88(3):329-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26294. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
A staged approach of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) followed by minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) is an alternative to the conventional combined coronary artery bypass and valve surgery for patients with concomitant coronary artery and valve disease. Limited data exist on degree of the completeness of revascularization achieved with this approach and its impact on outcomes.
A total of 138 patients, who underwent a staged approach between January 2009 and June 2013, were retrospectively evaluated. Coronary angiograms were reviewed by two cardiologists blinded to outcomes and were then categorized into two groups: complete or incomplete revascularization, which was defined as ≥1 major epicardial coronary arteries of at least 2.0 mm diameter with ≥70% untreated obstruction after the index PCI and before MIVS.
Complete and incomplete revascularization was achieved in 105 (76%) and 33 (24%) patients, respectively. The patients with incomplete revascularization had a lower ejection fraction, a higher STS score, and more prior myocardial infarctions and multi-vessel coronary artery disease. There were no differences in the post-operative complications, 30-day mortality, or 3-year survival (84 vs. 83%, P = 0.68). After a median follow-up of 29 months, incompletely revascularized patients had a higher incidence of acute coronary syndrome (2.9 vs. 12.9%, P = 0.05).
In patients undergoing a staged approach of PCI followed by MIVS, incomplete revascularization did not significantly impact the short or mid-term survival, but was associated with an increased incidence of acute coronary syndrome at follow-up. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
对于合并冠状动脉和瓣膜疾病的患者,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后行微创瓣膜手术(MIVS)的分期治疗方法是传统冠状动脉搭桥和瓣膜手术联合治疗的一种替代方案。关于这种方法实现的血运重建完全程度及其对预后的影响,现有数据有限。
回顾性评估了2009年1月至2013年6月期间接受分期治疗的138例患者。由两名对结果不知情的心脏病专家对冠状动脉造影进行评估,然后分为两组:完全血运重建或不完全血运重建,不完全血运重建定义为在首次PCI后及MIVS前,至少有1条直径≥2.0 mm的主要心外膜冠状动脉存在≥70%的未治疗阻塞。
分别有105例(76%)和33例(24%)患者实现了完全和不完全血运重建。不完全血运重建的患者射血分数较低,STS评分较高,既往心肌梗死和多支冠状动脉疾病更多。术后并发症、30天死亡率或3年生存率无差异(84%对83%,P = 0.68)。中位随访29个月后,不完全血运重建的患者急性冠状动脉综合征发生率较高(2.9%对12.9%,P = 0.05)。
在接受PCI后行MIVS分期治疗的患者中,不完全血运重建对短期或中期生存没有显著影响,但与随访时急性冠状动脉综合征发生率增加有关。© 2015威利期刊公司