Ricciardi Lucia, Demartini Benedetta, Crucianelli Laura, Krahé Charlotte, Edwards Mark J, Fotopoulou Aikaterini
Sobell Department, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Sobell Department, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Cattedra di Psichiatria - Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Universita` degli Studi di Milano, Italy.
Biol Psychol. 2016 Jan;113:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
Historically, emotional factors, such as trauma or psychological conflict, have been suggested as causal factors of functional motor disorders (FMD). More recent approaches have instead stressed potential neural and cognitive abnormalities in the allocation and maintenance of attention. Yet these studies have mostly focused on how attention is allocated to exteroceptive signals about the state of the body. Given the proposed important role of interoception for emotion, the study of FMD patients' ability to monitor their interoceptive signals may serve as a useful, mechanistic link between studies that aim to identify key emotional factors in FMD, and those that examine specific sensorimotor or cognitive abnormalities. In the current study, we compared the interoceptive awareness of a group of individuals with FMD (N=16) with a group of healthy controls (N=17). We employed a commonly used heartbeat detection task which tracks the level of concordance between one's heart rate and its subjective perception, as a proxy for interoceptive awareness more generally. We found that FMD patients have lower interoceptive accuracy than healthy subjects, and such reduced interoceptive accuracy was predictive of their depressive symptoms, as well as their tendency to focus on the external features of their body (self-objectification). Contary to our predictions, interoceptive accuracy was not predictive of alexithymia. These results suggest a potental trade-off between the allocation of attention to internal versus external aspects of the body in FMD. More generally, they warrant further investigation of interoceptive awareness in this population, as a means to understand their emotional abnormalities at a more mechanistic level than studies concentrating on traumatic life events and related risk factors.
从历史上看,诸如创伤或心理冲突等情感因素被认为是功能性运动障碍(FMD)的致病因素。相反,最近的研究方法更强调在注意力分配和维持方面潜在的神经和认知异常。然而,这些研究大多集中在注意力如何分配到关于身体状态的外感受信号上。鉴于内感受对情绪的重要作用,研究FMD患者监测其内感受信号的能力,可能有助于在旨在确定FMD关键情感因素的研究与那些检查特定感觉运动或认知异常的研究之间建立有用的机制联系。在本研究中,我们比较了一组FMD患者(N = 16)和一组健康对照者(N = 17)的内感受意识。我们采用了一种常用的心跳检测任务,该任务跟踪心率与其主观感知之间的一致性水平,以此作为更普遍的内感受意识的指标。我们发现,FMD患者的内感受准确性低于健康受试者,而这种内感受准确性的降低可预测他们的抑郁症状以及他们关注身体外部特征的倾向(自我客体化)。与我们的预测相反,内感受准确性并不能预测述情障碍。这些结果表明,FMD患者在将注意力分配到身体内部和外部方面可能存在潜在的权衡。更普遍地说,这值得对该人群的内感受意识进行进一步研究,作为一种比专注于创伤性生活事件和相关风险因素的研究更深入地理解他们情绪异常的机制的方法。