• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贴纸数量丰富:数字情境影响儿童的分享行为。

Being Sticker Rich: Numerical Context Influences Children's Sharing Behavior.

作者信息

Posid Tasha, Fazio Allyse, Cordes Sara

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.

Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):e0138928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138928. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0138928
PMID:26535900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4633172/
Abstract

Young children spontaneously share resources with anonymous recipients, but little is known about the specific circumstances that promote or hinder these prosocial tendencies. Children (ages 3-11) received a small (12) or large (30) number of stickers, and were then given the opportunity to share their windfall with either one or multiple anonymous recipients (Dictator Game). Whether a child chose to share or not varied as a function of age, but was uninfluenced by numerical context. Moreover, children's giving was consistent with a proportion-based account, such that children typically donated a similar proportion (but different absolute number) of the resources given to them, regardless of whether they originally received a small or large windfall. The proportion of resources donated, however, did vary based on the number of recipients with whom they were allowed to share, such that on average, children shared more when there were more recipients available, particularly when they had more resources, suggesting they take others into consideration when making prosocial decisions. Finally, results indicated that a child's gender also predicted sharing behavior, with males generally sharing more resources than females. Together, findings suggest that the numerical contexts under which children are asked to share, as well as the quantity of resources that they have to share, may interact to promote (or hinder) altruistic behaviors throughout childhood.

摘要

幼儿会自发地与匿名接受者分享资源,但对于促进或阻碍这些亲社会倾向的具体情况,我们知之甚少。儿童(3至11岁)得到少量(12个)或大量(30个)贴纸,然后有机会与一个或多个匿名接受者分享他们的意外之财(独裁者博弈)。孩子是否选择分享因年龄而异,但不受数字背景的影响。此外,孩子们的给予符合基于比例的说法,即孩子们通常会捐赠他们所获资源的相似比例(但绝对数量不同),无论他们最初得到的是少量还是大量意外之财。然而,捐赠资源的比例确实因允许他们分享的接受者数量而异,平均而言,当有更多接受者时,孩子们分享得更多,尤其是当他们有更多资源时,这表明他们在做出亲社会决策时会考虑他人。最后,结果表明孩子的性别也能预测分享行为,男性通常比女性分享更多资源。总之,研究结果表明,要求儿童分享时的数字背景以及他们必须分享的资源数量,可能相互作用,在整个童年时期促进(或阻碍)利他行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d48/4633172/4583f0f2f870/pone.0138928.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d48/4633172/73dae5bcc81d/pone.0138928.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d48/4633172/9be100617057/pone.0138928.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d48/4633172/5b3b9044894f/pone.0138928.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d48/4633172/e9452fca8dab/pone.0138928.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d48/4633172/4583f0f2f870/pone.0138928.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d48/4633172/73dae5bcc81d/pone.0138928.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d48/4633172/9be100617057/pone.0138928.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d48/4633172/5b3b9044894f/pone.0138928.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d48/4633172/e9452fca8dab/pone.0138928.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d48/4633172/4583f0f2f870/pone.0138928.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Being Sticker Rich: Numerical Context Influences Children's Sharing Behavior.贴纸数量丰富:数字情境影响儿童的分享行为。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):e0138928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138928. eCollection 2015.
2
The development of social comparisons and sharing behavior across 12 countries.12 个国家社会比较和分享行为的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Apr;192:104778. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104778. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
3
Altruistic sharing behavior in children: Role of theory of mind and inhibitory control.儿童的利他分享行为:心理理论与抑制控制的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jan;141:222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.010.
4
Family income affects children's altruistic behavior in the dictator game.家庭收入会影响儿童在独裁者游戏中的利他行为。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e80419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080419. eCollection 2013.
5
Giving preschoolers choice increases sharing behavior.让学龄前儿童有选择可以增加分享行为。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Oct;24(10):1971-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797613482335. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
6
Act generously when others do so: Majority influence on young children's sharing behavior.当他人慷慨时,自己也要慷慨:多数人对幼儿分享行为的影响。
Dev Sci. 2024 May;27(3):e13472. doi: 10.1111/desc.13472. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
7
The role of personal values in children's costly sharing and non-costly giving.个人价值观在儿童高成本分享和低成本给予中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:117-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
8
Sharing in Private and Public Situations: does this really Matter for Children?在私密和公共场合的分享:这对孩子真的重要吗?
Span J Psychol. 2015 Jun 19;18:E42. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.45.
9
The role of moral emotions in the development of children's sharing behavior.道德情感在儿童分享行为发展中的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Apr;50(4):1148-59. doi: 10.1037/a0035191. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
10
The interplay between sharing behavior and beliefs about others in children during dictator games.独裁者游戏中儿童分享行为与对他人看法之间的相互作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Feb;166:451-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Happy Little Benefactor: Prosocial Behaviors Promote Happiness in Young Children From Two Cultures.快乐的小施助者:亲社会行为促进两种文化背景下幼儿的幸福感。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 30;11:1398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01398. eCollection 2020.
2
Developmental Differences in Infants' Fairness Expectations From 6 to 15 Months of Age.6 至 15 个月婴儿公平期望的发展差异。
Child Dev. 2017 Nov;88(6):1930-1951. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12674. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Rational-number comparison across notation: Fractions, decimals, and whole numbers.不同记数法下的有理数比较:分数、小数和整数。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Feb;42(2):281-93. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000140. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
2
Children's giving: moral reasoning and moral emotions in the development of donation behaviors.儿童捐赠:捐赠行为发展中的道德推理和道德情感。
Front Psychol. 2014 May 23;5:458. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00458. eCollection 2014.
3
Social influences on inequity aversion in children.社会对儿童不平等厌恶的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 2;8(12):e80966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080966. eCollection 2013.
4
Fairness as partiality aversion: the development of procedural justice.公平即反感偏私:程序正义的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Mar;119:40-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
5
Unit asking: a method to boost donations and beyond.单位询问:一种提高捐赠数量的方法及其他。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1801-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797613482947. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
6
All inequality is not equal: children correct inequalities using resource value.所有不平等都不平等:儿童使用资源价值纠正不平等。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 19;4:393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00393. eCollection 2013.
7
Preschool children involve a third party in a dyadic sharing situation based on fairness.学前儿童基于公平原则将第三方卷入到二元分享情境中。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Sep;116(1):78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.12.014. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
8
I should but I won't: why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them.我本应但我没有:为什么年幼的孩子会认可公平分享的规范但却不遵守它们。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059510. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
9
Children develop a veil of fairness.儿童形成公平的面纱。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):363-75. doi: 10.1037/a0031247. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
10
Do infants have a sense of fairness?婴儿有公平感吗?
Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;23(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/0956797611422072. Epub 2012 Jan 17.