• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Dysport与Prosigne治疗颈部肌张力障碍的比较。

Comparison Between Dysport and Prosigne in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia.

作者信息

Barbosa Pedro Melo, Rodrigues Guilherme Ricciopo, de Oliveira Daniel Sabino, de Souza Carolina Pinto, Tumas Vitor

机构信息

From the Department of Neuroscience and Behavioral Sciences, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Neuropharmacol. 2015 Nov-Dec;38(6):221-6. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000107.

DOI:10.1097/WNF.0000000000000107
PMID:26536017
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Cervical dystonia is the most frequent type of primary focal dystonia and treatment with botulinum toxin (BTX) is currently the criterion standard.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of the following 2 formulations of BTXs available in Brazil: abobotulinumtoxin A (Dysport) and Lanzhou BTX type A (Prosigne), during a follow-up of 13 months.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double blind trial with 1 group being treated with Dysport and the other with Prosigne.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were randomized to receive Dysport and 20 patients to receive Prosigne, each patient was followed during 13 months and received 5 injections of BTX in this period. The dose equivalency used was 3 U of Dysport for 1 U of Prosigne. After each treatment session, we assessed improvement with the Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change scale and asked about adverse effects and duration of improvement. We also used the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) before and after the first and fifth treatment sessions. After the first injection, mean TWSTRS values reduced 12.78 points in the Dysport group and 9.98 in the Prosigne group (P = 0.38). After the last injection, the reduction in TWSTRS values was 11.87 points for Dysport and 11.35 points for Prosigne (P = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed similar efficacy and safety profiles when comparing both toxins in the treatment of cervical dystonia.

摘要

未标注

颈部肌张力障碍是最常见的原发性局灶性肌张力障碍类型,肉毒杆菌毒素(BTX)治疗目前是标准疗法。

目的

在本研究中,我们比较了巴西现有的以下两种肉毒杆菌毒素制剂:a型肉毒杆菌毒素(保妥适)和兰州a型肉毒杆菌毒素(衡力)在13个月随访期内的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验,一组接受保妥适治疗,另一组接受衡力治疗。

结果

14例患者被随机分配接受保妥适治疗,20例患者接受衡力治疗,每位患者随访13个月,在此期间接受5次肉毒杆菌毒素注射。使用的剂量等效性为1单位衡力相当于3单位保妥适。每次治疗后,我们用基于临床医生访谈的变化印象量表评估改善情况,并询问不良反应和改善持续时间。我们还在第一次和第五次治疗前后使用了多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表(TWSTRS)。第一次注射后,保妥适组TWSTRS平均分值降低12.78分,衡力组降低9.98分(P = 0.38)。最后一次注射后,保妥适组TWSTRS分值降低11.87分,衡力组降低11.35分(P = 0.86)。

结论

我们的数据显示,在治疗颈部肌张力障碍时,比较两种毒素的疗效和安全性相似。

相似文献

1
Comparison Between Dysport and Prosigne in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia.Dysport与Prosigne治疗颈部肌张力障碍的比较。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2015 Nov-Dec;38(6):221-6. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000107.
2
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of type a botulinum toxins botox and prosigne in the treatment of cervical dystonia.一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,比较A型肉毒杆菌毒素保妥适和普罗辛在治疗颈部肌张力障碍方面的疗效和安全性。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2010 Jan-Feb;33(1):22-6. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e3181c46f48.
3
A Comparison of Botox 100 U/mL and Dysport 100 U/mL Using Dose Conversion Ratio 1: 3 and 1: 1.7 in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover Trial.使用1:3和1:1.7剂量转换比的100 U/mL肉毒杆菌毒素和100 U/mL地宝毒素治疗颈部肌张力障碍的比较:一项双盲、随机、交叉试验。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2015 Sep-Oct;38(5):170-6. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000101.
4
Long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) in cervical dystonia.A型肉毒毒素(丽舒妥)治疗颈肌张力障碍的长期疗效和安全性。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010 Jun;16(5):316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
5
Dysport and Botox at a ratio of 2.5:1 units in cervical dystonia: a double-blind, randomized study.肉毒杆菌素A与保妥适以2.5:1单位比例用于治疗颈部肌张力障碍:一项双盲随机研究
Mov Disord. 2015 Feb;30(2):206-13. doi: 10.1002/mds.26085. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
6
Efficacy and safety of botulinum type A toxin (Dysport) in cervical dystonia: results of the first US randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.A型肉毒毒素(Dysport)治疗颈部肌张力障碍的疗效与安全性:美国首个随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的结果
Mov Disord. 2005 Jul;20(7):783-91. doi: 10.1002/mds.20403.
7
Efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA liquid formulation in cervical dystonia: A randomized-controlled trial.阿柏西普肉毒素A液体制剂治疗颈部肌张力障碍的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Mov Disord. 2016 Nov;31(11):1649-1657. doi: 10.1002/mds.26760. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
A mixed treatment comparison to compare the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin treatments for cervical dystonia.一项混合治疗比较,以比较肉毒杆菌毒素治疗颈部肌张力障碍的疗效和安全性。
J Neurol. 2016 Apr;263(4):772-80. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8050-2. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
9
A double blind, randomised, parallel group study to investigate the dose equivalence of Dysport and Botox in the treatment of cervical dystonia.一项双盲、随机、平行组研究,旨在调查Dysport和保妥适在治疗颈部肌张力障碍方面的剂量等效性。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;64(1):6-12. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.1.6.
10
Low-dose botulinum toxin-a treatment of cervical dystonia - a double-blind, randomized pilot study.
Eur Neurol. 2002;47(4):214-21. doi: 10.1159/000057902.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing the Surgical Decision in Dystonia Patients Referred for Deep Brain Stimulation.影响转诊接受脑深部电刺激术的肌张力障碍患者手术决策的因素
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Jul 22;13(8):511. doi: 10.3390/toxins13080511.
2
Lantox-The Chinese Botulinum Toxin Drug-Complete English Bibliography and Comprehensive Formalised Literature Review.兰托克斯——中国肉毒杆菌毒素药物——完整英文参考文献及全面形式化文献综述
Toxins (Basel). 2021 May 22;13(6):370. doi: 10.3390/toxins13060370.
3
Use of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Adults with Cervical Dystonia: A Systematic Literature Review.
应用阿替瑞林毒素 A 治疗成人颈部肌张力障碍:系统文献回顾。
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Jul 24;12(8):470. doi: 10.3390/toxins12080470.