Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts2Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):217-24. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.3940.
The influx of new surgical residents and interns at the beginning of the academic year is assumed to be associated with poor outcomes. Referred to as the July phenomenon, this occurrence has been anecdotally associated with increases in the frequency of medical errors due to intern inexperience. Studies in various surgical specialties provide conflicting results.
To determine whether an association between the July phenomenon and outcomes exists among a nationally representative sample of patients who underwent emergency general surgery (EGS).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of data from the 2007-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Data on adult patients (≥16 years of age) presenting to teaching hospitals with a principal diagnosis of an EGS condition, as defined by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, were retrospectively analyzed. The patients who were included in our study were dichotomized into early (July-August) vs late (September-June) management. The original analyses were conducted in March 2015.
Risk-adjusted multivariable regression based on calculated propensity scores was assessed for associations with differences in in-hospital mortality, complications, length of stay, and total hospital cost.
A total of 1,433,528 patients who underwent EGS were included, weighted to represent 7,095,045 patients from 581 teaching hospitals nationwide; 17.6% were managed early. Relative to patients managed later, early patients had marginally lower risk-adjusted odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.92-0.99]), complications (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]), and developing a secondary EGS condition (OR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.97-0.98]). Length of stay and total hospital cost were comparable between the 2 groups (P > .05).
Contrary to expectations, the EGS patients who were managed early fared equally well, if not better, than the EGS patients who were managed later. Potentially attributable to increased manpower and/or hypervigilance on the part of supervising senior residents or attending physicians, the results suggest that concerns among EGS patients related to the July phenomenon are unfounded.
在学年开始时涌入的新外科住院医师和实习医师被认为与不良结果有关。这种现象被称为“七月现象”,由于实习医生经验不足,据推测会增加医疗错误的频率,这种现象已经被传闻证实。在不同的外科专业中,研究结果存在矛盾。
确定在接受急诊普通外科 (EGS) 治疗的全国代表性患者样本中,是否存在“七月现象”与结局之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:对 2007 年至 2011 年全国住院患者样本的数据进行回顾性分析。回顾性分析了美国创伤外科学会定义的 EGS 疾病主要诊断为成人患者(≥16 岁)的数据。将纳入本研究的患者分为早期(7 月至 8 月)和晚期(9 月至 6 月)管理。原始分析于 2015 年 3 月进行。
根据计算的倾向评分进行风险调整的多变量回归,以评估与住院死亡率、并发症、住院时间和总住院费用差异的相关性。
共纳入 1433528 例接受 EGS 的患者,加权后代表全国 581 家教学医院的 7095045 例患者;17.6%的患者接受早期管理。与晚期管理的患者相比,早期管理的患者的死亡风险调整比值比(OR)略低(0.96 [95%CI,0.92-0.99])、并发症(OR,0.98 [95%CI,0.96-0.99])和新发二级 EGS 疾病(OR,0.97 [95%CI,0.97-0.98])。两组的住院时间和总住院费用无差异(P>.05)。
与预期相反,接受早期管理的 EGS 患者的情况与接受晚期管理的患者一样好,如果不是更好的话。可能由于监督住院医师或主治医生增加了人力和/或警惕性,结果表明 EGS 患者对“七月现象”的担忧是没有根据的。