• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[跨学科急诊科中生前预嘱的可用性:患者调查结果]

[The availability of living wills in an interdisciplinary emergency department: results of a patient survey].

作者信息

Christ M, Liebeton J, Breker I M, Grett M, von Auenmüller K I, Trappe H-J

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik II, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr - Universität Bochum, Deutschland.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2015 Nov;140(22):e231-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-106869. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-106869
PMID:26536652
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite an increasing attention to living wills, the effects of such living wills on patient care in the emergency departments remains unknown.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients who were admitted to our emergency department between September 24th, 2014 and November 23th, 2014 were asked, whether they have signed living wills previously and if so, whether they have it on hand at admission.

RESULTS

496 patients (229 men (46.2 %), 267 women (53.8 %)) with a mean age of 64.9 ± 18.8 years were included in this survey. 138 patients (27.8 %) had a living will but only 16 patients (3.2 %) had it on hand.Altogether, the existence of living wills increased with an increasing patient`s age; only 5 of 117 patients aged 50 years old or younger (4,3 %) had a living will, but 133 of 379 patients older than 50 years (35,1 %).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Despite an obviously broad acceptance of living wills especially in the elderly population, there are hardly any consequences on the daily patient care in an emergency department by now, as hardly any patient has hers or his living will on hand at admission. We therefore see the need for further educational work to guarantee that living wills get adequate priority in patient care at emergency departments.

摘要

引言

尽管对生前预嘱的关注日益增加,但此类生前预嘱对急诊科患者护理的影响仍不明确。

材料与方法

询问了2014年9月24日至2014年11月23日期间入住我院急诊科的所有患者,他们之前是否签署了生前预嘱,如果签署了,入院时是否随身携带。

结果

本次调查纳入了496例患者(229例男性(46.2%),267例女性(53.8%)),平均年龄为64.9±18.8岁。138例患者(27.8%)有生前预嘱,但只有16例患者(3.2%)随身携带。总体而言,生前预嘱的存在随着患者年龄的增加而增加;50岁及以下的117例患者中只有5例(4.3%)有生前预嘱,而50岁以上的379例患者中有133例(35.1%)有生前预嘱。

讨论与结论

尽管生前预嘱显然得到了广泛认可,尤其是在老年人群体中,但目前对急诊科日常患者护理几乎没有任何影响,因为几乎没有患者在入院时随身携带生前预嘱。因此,我们认为有必要开展进一步的教育工作,以确保生前预嘱在急诊科患者护理中得到应有的重视。

相似文献

1
[The availability of living wills in an interdisciplinary emergency department: results of a patient survey].[跨学科急诊科中生前预嘱的可用性:患者调查结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2015 Nov;140(22):e231-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-106869. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
2
[Relevance of Living Wills During Post-Resuscitation Care].[生前预嘱在心肺复苏后护理中的相关性]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2017 Jul;142(14):e95-e99. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-100052. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
Living wills and the Mental Capacity Act: a postal questionnaire survey of UK geriatricians.生前预嘱与《精神能力法案》:对英国老年病科医生的邮政问卷调查
Age Ageing. 2006 Mar;35(2):116-21. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afj035. Epub 2006 Jan 13.
4
[Dying with dignity. A study of living wills].[尊严死。生前预嘱研究]
Gac Sanit. 2010 Nov-Dec;24(6):437-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2010.09.006. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
5
Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of elderly persons regarding living wills.老年人对生前预嘱的认知、态度和行为
Arch Intern Med. 1991 Feb;151(2):277-80.
6
Concordance of Advance Care Plans With Inpatient Directives in the Electronic Medical Record for Older Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department.急诊科收治老年患者电子病历中预先护理计划与住院医嘱的一致性
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Apr;51(4):647-651. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.318. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
7
Living wills and resuscitation preferences in an elderly population.老年人群的生前预嘱与复苏意愿
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Jan 23;155(2):171-5.
8
[Patient living wills in Germany: conditions for their increase and reasons for refusal].[德国的患者生前预嘱:其增加的条件及拒绝的原因]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007 Nov;132(48):2558-62. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993097.
9
The use of living wills at the end of life. A national study.生前预嘱在生命末期的使用。一项全国性研究。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 May 13;156(9):1018-22.
10
Discussing living wills. A qualitative study of a German sample of neurologists and ALS patients.讨论生前预嘱:对德国神经科医生和肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者样本的定性研究
J Neurol Sci. 2005 Oct 15;237(1-2):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.05.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance directives in the emergency department-a systematic review of the status quo.急诊科中的预先指示——现状的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 3;24(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10819-1.
2
[Opportunities and risks of advance directives : An appraisal of the practice in Germany after legal regulation in 2009].[预立医疗指示的机遇与风险:对2009年法律规制后德国实践情况的评估]
Schmerz. 2025 Apr;39(2):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s00482-023-00771-0. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
3
[Survey on the presence of palliative care knowledge and palliative care structures in German emergency departments].
[德国急诊科姑息治疗知识及姑息治疗机构现状调查]
Anaesthesiologie. 2023 Dec;72(12):863-870. doi: 10.1007/s00101-023-01356-3. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
4
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.360 度德尔菲法:应对医疗信息技术的社会技术挑战。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.
5
Advance Directives and Powers of Attorney in Intensive Care Patients.重症患者的预先指示和授权委托书。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Jun 5;114(21):363-370. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0363.