Araujo Paulo H, Asai Shigehiro, Pinto Mauricio, Protta Thiago, Middleton Kellie, Linde-Rosen Monica, Irrgang James, Smolinski Patrick, Fu Freddie H
SHIS QL 8 Conj 2 Casa 19, Lago Sul Brasília - DF, Brazil 71620-225.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Kaufmann Building, Suite 1011, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail address for F. Fu:
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Nov 4;97(21):1767-73. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00539.
The purpose of our study was to evaluate the relationship between graft placement and in situ graft force after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained for twelve human cadaveric knees. The knees, in intact and deficient-ACL states, were subjected to external loading conditions as follows: an anterior tibial load of 89 N at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° of flexion and a combined rotatory (simulated pivot-shift) load of 5 Nm of internal tibial torque and 7 Nm of valgus torque at 0°, 15°, and 30° of flexion. Three ACL reconstructions were performed in a randomized order: from the center of the tibial insertion site to the center of the femoral insertion site (Mid), the center of the tibial insertion site to a more vertical femoral position (S1), and the center of the tibial insertion site to an even more vertical femoral position (S2). The reconstructions were tested following the same protocol used for the intact state, and graft in situ force was calculated for the two loadings at each flexion angle. MRI was used to measure the graft inclination angle after each ACL reconstruction.
The mean inclination angle (and standard deviation) was 51.7° ± 5.0° for the native ACL, 51.6° ± 4.1° for the Mid reconstruction (p = 0.85), 58.7° ± 5.4° for S1 (p < 0.001), and 64.7° ± 6.5° for S2 (p < 0.001). At 0°, 15°, and 30° of knee flexion, the Mid reconstruction showed in situ graft force that was closer to that of the native ACL during both anterior tibial loading and simulated pivot-shift loading than was the case for S1 and S2 reconstructions. At greater flexion angles, S1 and S2 had in situ graft force that was closer to that of the native ACL than was the case for the Mid reconstruction.
Anatomic ACL reconstruction exposes grafts to higher loads at lower angles of knee flexion.
Rehabilitation and return to sports progression may need to be modified to protect an anatomically placed graft after ACL reconstruction.
我们研究的目的是评估前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后移植物放置与原位移植物受力之间的关系。
对12具人类尸体膝关节进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查。这些膝关节在ACL完整和缺失状态下,分别承受以下外部负荷条件:在0°、15°、30°、45°、60°和90°屈膝角度下施加89 N的胫骨前向负荷,以及在0°、15°和30°屈膝角度下施加5 Nm的胫骨内旋扭矩和7 Nm的外翻扭矩的联合旋转(模拟轴移)负荷。以随机顺序进行三次ACL重建:从胫骨插入点中心到股骨插入点中心(Mid)、从胫骨插入点中心到股骨更垂直位置(S1)、从胫骨插入点中心到股骨更垂直位置(S2)。重建后按照与完整状态相同的方案进行测试,并计算每个屈膝角度下两种负荷时的原位移植物受力。每次ACL重建后,使用MRI测量移植物倾斜角度。
天然ACL的平均倾斜角度(及标准差)为51.7°±5.0°,Mid重建为51.6°±4.1°(p = 0.85),S1为58.7°±5.4°(p < 0.001),S2为64.7°±6.5°(p < 0.001)。在0°、15°和30°屈膝角度下,与S1和S2重建相比,Mid重建在胫骨前向负荷和模拟轴移负荷过程中显示出的原位移植物受力更接近天然ACL。在更大屈膝角度下,S1和S2的原位移植物受力比Mid重建更接近天然ACL。
解剖学ACL重建使移植物在较低屈膝角度下承受更高负荷。
ACL重建后,可能需要调整康复方案和恢复运动进程,以保护解剖位置放置的移植物。