Suppr超能文献

我们是否需要降低 2010 年 ACR/EULAR 类风湿关节炎分类标准的切点?

Do we need to lower the cut point of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis?

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam,

Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Apr;55(4):636-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev383. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study we aimed to evaluate the effect of lowering the cut point of the 2010 criteria to identify more patients with RA among early inflammatory arthritis patients.

METHODS

We included early arthritis patients from the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort with at least one joint with clinical synovitis and symptoms for <1 year, with no other explanation for their symptoms. The demographic and clinical characteristics of each patient were recorded at baseline. Patients were classified as case or non-case at the 1-year follow-up by the definition used in the development of the 2010 criteria (MTX initiation). To assess the diagnostic performance of the 2010 criteria, the sensitivity and specificity at each cut point were determined.

RESULTS

We included 557 patients in our analysis. At the 1-year follow-up, 253 patients (45%) were classified as case (MTX use). In the group of patients who scored 0-5 points (n = 328), 98 patients (30%) were classified as case (MTX use). The sensitivity and specificity of the 2010 criteria using the cut point of 6 were 61% and 76%, respectively. With the cut point of 5, the sensitivity would increase to 76% and the specificity would decrease to 68%.

CONCLUSION

By lowering the cut point of the 2010 criteria from 6 to 5 points, we were able to identify 15% more RA patients at the cost of 8% more false-positive patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估降低 2010 年标准的切点以识别更多早期炎症性关节炎患者中 RA 患者的效果。

方法

我们纳入了 Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort 中的早期关节炎患者,这些患者至少有一个关节存在临床滑膜炎和症状<1 年,且无其他原因可解释其症状。每位患者的人口统计学和临床特征均在基线时记录。通过在 2010 年标准制定中使用的定义(MTX 起始),在 1 年随访时将每位患者分类为病例或非病例。为评估 2010 年标准的诊断性能,确定了每个切点的敏感性和特异性。

结果

我们的分析纳入了 557 例患者。在 1 年随访时,253 例患者(45%)被分类为病例(MTX 使用)。在评分 0-5 分的患者组(n=328)中,98 例患者(30%)被分类为病例(MTX 使用)。使用 6 分切点的 2010 年标准的敏感性和特异性分别为 61%和 76%。使用 5 分切点时,敏感性将增加到 76%,特异性将降低到 68%。

结论

通过将 2010 年标准的切点从 6 分降低到 5 分,可以在增加 15%的 RA 患者的同时,增加 8%的假阳性患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验