• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国临床实践指南质量管理体系的发展

Development of Quality Management Systems for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Korea.

作者信息

Jo Heui-Sug, Kim Dong Ik, Chang Sung-Goo, Shin Ein-Soon, Oh Moo-Kyung

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, Kangwon National University, School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea. ; The Executive Committee for Clinical Practice Guideline, The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Radiology, Yonsei University Sevrance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30(11):1553-7. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1553. Epub 2015 Oct 16.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1553
PMID:26538997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4630469/
Abstract

This study introduces the Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) appraisal system by the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS). Quality management policies for CPGs vary among different countries, which have their own cultures and health care systems. However, supporting developers in guideline development and appraisals using standardized tools are common practices. KAMS, an organization representing the various medical societies of Korea, has been striving to establish a quality management system for CPGs, and has established a CPGs quality management system that reflects the characteristics of the Korean healthcare environment and the needs of its users. KAMS created a foundation for the development of CPGs, set up an independent appraisal organization, enacted regulations related to the appraisals, and trained appraisers. These efforts could enhance the ability of each individual medical society to develop CPGs, to increase the quality of the CPGs, and to ultimately improve the quality of the information available to decision-makers.

摘要

本研究介绍了韩国医学科学院(KAMS)的临床实践指南(CPG)评估系统。不同国家的CPG质量管理政策各不相同,这些国家有着各自的文化和医疗保健系统。然而,使用标准化工具支持指南开发者进行指南制定和评估是常见做法。KAMS作为代表韩国各医学协会的组织,一直在努力建立CPG质量管理体系,并已建立了一个反映韩国医疗环境特点及其用户需求的CPG质量管理体系。KAMS为CPG的制定奠定了基础,设立了独立的评估组织,颁布了与评估相关的法规,并培训了评估人员。这些努力可以提高各个医学协会制定CPG的能力,提高CPG的质量,并最终改善决策者可获得信息的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/4630469/db2c11e1e37f/jkms-30-1553-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/4630469/d395706bab17/jkms-30-1553-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/4630469/db2c11e1e37f/jkms-30-1553-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/4630469/d395706bab17/jkms-30-1553-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/4630469/db2c11e1e37f/jkms-30-1553-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of Quality Management Systems for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Korea.韩国临床实践指南质量管理体系的发展
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30(11):1553-7. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1553. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
2
Towards evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in Saudi Arabia.迈向沙特阿拉伯基于证据的临床实践指南。
Saudi Med J. 2004 Nov;25(11):1555-8.
3
South African clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis.南非临床实践指南:一项全景分析。
S Afr Med J. 2017 Dec 13;108(1):23-27. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v108i1.12825.
4
[From clinical practice guidelines towards quality assurance].从临床实践指南到质量保证
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011 Feb;54(2):160-5. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1207-8.
5
Current Status of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Korea.韩国临床实践指南的现状。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Feb 8;36(6):e35. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e35.
6
Methodological Quality Appraisal of 27 Korean Guidelines Using a Scoring Guide Based on the AGREE II Instrument and a Web-based Evaluation.使用基于AGREE II工具的评分指南和基于网络的评估方法对27份韩国指南进行方法学质量评估
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 May;31(5):682-7. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.682. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
7
Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines: Current Status of Adherence to the RIGHT Checklist.韩国临床实践指南:对 RIGHT 清单的依从性现状。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Jan 24;37(4):e26. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e26.
8
Quality of stroke rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines.中风康复临床实践指南的质量
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(4):657-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00708.x.
9
Appraisal of the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the Philippines.菲律宾临床实践指南方法学质量评价。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Oct;34(4):e1723-e1735. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2886. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
10
Need for high-standard translation methodology for the dissemination of guidelines.传播指南需要高标准的翻译方法。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Dec;17(12):1536-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
[Reflections on 20 years of clinical practice guideline programmes in Germany: what is their impact?].[对德国临床实践指南项目20年的反思:它们有何影响?]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(10):550-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
2
Improving the reliability of clinical practice guideline appraisals: effects of the Korean AGREE II scoring guide.提高临床实践指南评估的可靠性:韩国AGREE II评分指南的影响
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jun;29(6):771-5. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.6.771. Epub 2014 May 30.
3
The Clinical Practice Guideline Initiative: A joint collaboration designed to improve the quality of care delivered by doctors of chiropractic.
临床实践指南倡议:一项旨在提高整脊医生提供的医疗服务质量的联合合作项目。
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2013 Dec;57(4):279-84.
4
Experiences and barriers to implementation of clinical practice guideline for depression in Korea.韩国实施抑郁症临床实践指南的经验和障碍。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 May 27;13:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-150.
5
Assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in Korea using the AGREE Instrument.使用 AGREE 工具评估韩国临床实践指南的质量。
J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Mar;28(3):357-65. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.3.357. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
6
Developing a scoring guide for the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument in Korea: a modified Delphi consensus process.制定韩国研究评估指南 II 工具的评分指南:改良 Delphi 共识过程。
J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Feb;28(2):190-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.2.190. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
7
Clinical guidelines in the European Union: mapping the regulatory basis, development, quality control, implementation and evaluation across member states.欧盟临床指南:绘制成员国的监管基础、制定、质量控制、实施和评估图谱。
Health Policy. 2012 Oct;107(2-3):146-56. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
8
Development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines: current status in Korea.临床实践指南的制定和实施:韩国的现状。
J Korean Med Sci. 2012 May;27 Suppl(Suppl):S55-60. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.S.S55. Epub 2012 May 18.
9
A comprehensive model of factors affecting adoption of clinical practice guidelines in Korea.影响韩国临床实践指南采用的综合因素模型。
J Korean Med Sci. 2010 Nov;25(11):1568-73. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.11.1568. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
10
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.《AGREE II:推进卫生保健领域的指南制定、报告与评估》
CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E839-42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090449. Epub 2010 Jul 5.