Morgado Rui G, Gomes Pedro A D, Ferreira Nuno G C, Cardoso Diogo N, Santos Miguel J G, Soares Amadeu M V M, Loureiro Susana
Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Chemosphere. 2016 Feb;144:1845-53. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.034. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
A main source of uncertainty currently associated with environmental risk assessment of chemicals is the poor understanding of the influence of environmental factors on the toxicity of xenobiotics. Aiming to reduce this uncertainty, here we evaluate the joint-effects of two pesticides (chlorpyrifos and mancozeb) on the terrestrial isopod Porcellionides pruinosus under different soil moisture regimes. A full factorial design, including three treatments of each pesticide and an untreated control, were performed under different soil moisture regimes: 25%, 50%, and 75% WHC. Our results showed that soil moisture had no effects on isopods survival, at the levels assessed in this experiment, neither regarding single pesticides nor mixture treatments. Additivity was always the most parsimonious result when both pesticides were present. Oppositely, both feeding activity and biomass change showed a higher sensitivity to soil moisture, with isopods generally showing worse performance when exposed to pesticides and dry or moist conditions. Most of the significant differences between soil moisture regimes were found in single pesticide treatments, yet different responses to mixtures could still be distinguished depending on the soil moisture assessed. This study shows that while soil moisture has the potential to influence the effects of the pesticide mixture itself, such effects might become less important in a context of complex combinations of stressors, as the major contribution comes from its individual interaction with each pesticide. Finally, the implications of our results are discussed in light of the current state of environmental risk assessment procedures and some future perspectives are advanced.
目前,化学物质环境风险评估中不确定性的一个主要来源是对环境因素对异生物素毒性影响的理解不足。为了减少这种不确定性,我们在此评估了两种农药(毒死蜱和代森锰锌)在不同土壤湿度条件下对陆生等足动物粗糙真地鳖的联合效应。在不同土壤湿度条件下(田间持水量的25%、50%和75%),进行了全因子设计,包括每种农药的三种处理和一个未处理对照。我们的结果表明,在本实验评估的水平下,土壤湿度对等足动物的存活没有影响,无论是单一农药处理还是混合处理。当两种农药都存在时,相加作用总是最简约的结果。相反,取食活动和生物量变化对土壤湿度表现出更高的敏感性,等足动物在接触农药以及干燥或潮湿条件时通常表现较差。土壤湿度条件之间的大多数显著差异出现在单一农药处理中,但根据评估的土壤湿度,对混合物的不同反应仍然可以区分。这项研究表明,虽然土壤湿度有可能影响农药混合物本身的效应,但在应激源复杂组合的背景下,这种效应可能变得不那么重要,因为主要贡献来自其与每种农药的单独相互作用。最后,根据环境风险评估程序的现状讨论了我们结果的意义,并提出了一些未来展望。