Hatch L Dupree, Grubb Peter H, Lea Amanda S, Walsh William F, Markham Melinda H, Whitney Gina M, Slaughter James C, Stark Ann R, Ely E Wesley
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
J Pediatr. 2016 Jan;168:62-66.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.09.077. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
To determine the rate of adverse events associated with endotracheal intubation in newborns and modifiable factors contributing to these events.
We conducted a prospective, observational study in a 100-bed, academic, level IV neonatal intensive care unit from September 2013 through June 2014. We collected data on intubations using standardized data collection instruments with validation by medical record review. Intubations in the delivery or operating rooms were excluded. The primary outcome was an intubation with any adverse event. Adverse events were defined and tracked prospectively as nonsevere or severe. We measured clinical variables including number of attempts to successful intubation and intubation urgency (elective, urgent, or emergent). We used logistic regression models to estimate the association of these variables with adverse events.
During the study period, 304 intubations occurred in 178 infants. Data were available for 273 intubations (90%) in 162 patients. Adverse events occurred in 107 (39%) intubations with nonsevere and severe events in 96 (35%) and 24 (8.8%) intubations, respectively. Increasing number of intubation attempts (OR 2.1, 95% CI, 1.6-2.6) and emergent intubations (OR 4.7, 95% CI, 1.7-13) were predictors of adverse events. The primary cause of emergent intubations was unplanned extubation (62%).
Adverse events are common in the neonatal intensive care unit, occurring in 4 of 10 intubations. The odds of an adverse event doubled with increasing number of attempts and quadrupled in the emergent setting. Quality improvement efforts to address these factors are needed to improve patient safety.
确定新生儿气管插管相关不良事件的发生率以及导致这些事件的可改变因素。
2013年9月至2014年6月,我们在一家拥有100张床位的学术性四级新生儿重症监护病房进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。我们使用标准化数据收集工具收集插管数据,并通过病历审查进行验证。分娩室或手术室的插管被排除在外。主要结局是发生任何不良事件的插管。不良事件被前瞻性地定义为非严重或严重事件。我们测量了临床变量,包括成功插管的尝试次数和插管紧急程度(择期、紧急或急诊)。我们使用逻辑回归模型来估计这些变量与不良事件之间的关联。
在研究期间,178例婴儿发生了304次插管。162例患者中有273次插管(90%)的数据可用。107次(39%)插管发生了不良事件,其中96次(35%)为非严重事件,24次(8.8%)为严重事件。插管尝试次数增加(比值比2.1,95%置信区间,1.6 - 2.6)和急诊插管(比值比4.7,95%置信区间,1.7 - 13)是不良事件的预测因素。急诊插管的主要原因是意外拔管(62%)。
不良事件在新生儿重症监护病房很常见,每10次插管中有4次发生。不良事件的几率随着尝试次数的增加而翻倍,在急诊情况下则增加四倍。需要开展质量改进工作来解决这些因素,以提高患者安全性。