Bischof Johanna E, Worrall Christine, Thompson Peter, Marti David, Smith Stephen W
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;34(2):149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.09.035. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
ST-segment elevation (STE) due to inferior STE myocardial infarction (STEMI) may be misdiagnosed as pericarditis. Conversely, this less life-threatening etiology of ST elevation may be confused for inferior STEMI. We sought to determine if the presence of any ST-segment depression in lead aVL would differentiate inferior STEMI from pericarditis.
Retrospective study of 3 populations. Cohort 1 included patients coded as inferior STEMI, cohort 2 included patients with a discharge diagnosis of pericarditis who presented with chest pain and at least 0.5 mm of ST elevation in at least 1 inferior lead. We analyzed the presenting electrocardiogram in both populations, with careful assessment of leads II, III, aVF, and aVL. In addition, we retrospectively studied a third cohort of patients with subtle inferior STEMI (<1-mm STE with occluded artery on catheterization) and assessed the sensitivity of ST depression in lead aVL for this group.
Of 154 inferior STEMI patients, 154 had some amount of ST depression in lead aVL (100%; confidence interval, 98%-100%). Of the 49 electrocardiograms in the pericarditis group, all 49 had some inferior STE but none had any ST-segment depression in lead aVL (specificity, 100%; confidence interval, 91%-100%). In the third cohort, there were 272 inferior MIs with coronary occlusion, of which 54 were "subtle." Of these, 49 had some ST depression in lead aVL.
When there is inferior ST-segment elevation, the presence of any ST depression in lead aVL is highly sensitive for coronary occlusion in inferior myocardial infarction and very specific for differentiating inferior myocardial infarction from pericarditis.
下壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)所致的ST段抬高(STE)可能被误诊为心包炎。相反,这种威胁生命程度较低的ST段抬高病因可能被误诊为下壁STEMI。我们试图确定aVL导联出现ST段压低是否能将下壁STEMI与心包炎区分开来。
对3组人群进行回顾性研究。队列1包括被编码为下壁STEMI的患者,队列2包括出院诊断为心包炎且有胸痛表现且至少1个下壁导联ST段抬高至少0.5 mm的患者。我们分析了两组人群的初始心电图,仔细评估了II、III、aVF和aVL导联。此外,我们回顾性研究了第三组轻度下壁STEMI患者(导管检查显示动脉闭塞但ST段抬高<1 mm),并评估了aVL导联ST段压低对该组患者的敏感性。
154例下壁STEMI患者中,154例aVL导联存在一定程度的ST段压低(100%;置信区间,98%-100%)。心包炎组的49份心电图中,所有49例均有一定程度的下壁STE,但aVL导联均无ST段压低(特异性,100%;置信区间,91%-100%)。在第三组中,有272例冠状动脉闭塞的下壁心肌梗死患者,其中54例为“轻度”。其中,49例aVL导联有一定程度的ST段压低。
当下壁出现ST段抬高时,aVL导联出现任何ST段压低对下壁心肌梗死中的冠状动脉闭塞具有高度敏感性,且对区分下壁心肌梗死与心包炎具有高度特异性。