Use of Lung Ultrasound to Assess the Efficacy of an Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver in Rabbits With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the application of lung ultrasound (US) in the evaluation and implementation of alveolar recruitment maneuvers in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

Twelve rabbits with saline lavage-induced lung injury were randomly divided into 2 groups: one with alveolar recruitment guided by lung US and the other with alveolar recruitment guided by maximal oxygenation. Recruitment maneuvers were applied according to a stepwise incremental positive end-expiratory pressure method in both groups. In the oxygenation group, a sum of the partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide exceeding 400 mm Hg was used to define adequate recruitment. In the lung US group, a new protocol for reaeration in US-guided lung recruitment was used to guide treatment. Evaluation by lung US, respiratory mechanical parameters, the Smith pathologic score (Crit Care Med 1997; 25:1888-1897), and wet-to-dry ratio were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Opening pressure was significantly higher in the lung US group (mean ± SD, 23.4 ± 3.4 cm H2O) than the oxygenation group (18.7 ± 2.1 cm H2O; P < .05). The reaeration score in the lung US group significantly increased during alveolar recruitment (6.5 ± 1.6 points at baseline versus 13.8 ± 3.0 points after completion; P < .05). Lung compliance, dead space shunts, the Smith pathologic score, and tissue wet-to-dry ratio, however, were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung US is an effective means of evaluating and guiding alveolar recruitment in ARDS. Compared with the maximal oxygenation-guided method, the protocol for reaeration in US-guided lung recruitment achieved a higher opening pressure, resulted in greater improvements in lung aeration, and substantially reduced lung heterogeneity in ARDS.