National Institute for Mental Health Research The Australian National University Canberra Australia.
JMIR Ment Health. 2015 May 19;2(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/mental.4418. eCollection 2015 Apr-Jun.
Adolescence and early adulthood are critical periods for the development of mental disorders. Online peer-to-peer communication is popular among young people and may improve mental health by providing social support. Previous systematic reviews have targeted Internet support groups for adults with mental health problems, including depression. However, there have been no systematic reviews examining the effectiveness of online peer-to-peer support in improving the mental health of adolescents and young adults.
The aim of this review was to systematically identify available evidence for the effectiveness of online peer-to peer support for young people with mental health problems.
The PubMed, PsycInfo, and Cochrane databases were searched using keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. Retrieved abstracts (n=3934) were double screened and coded. Studies were included if they (1) investigated an online peer-to-peer interaction, (2) the interaction discussed topics related to mental health, (3) the age range of the sample was between 12 to 25 years, and (4) the study evaluated the effectiveness of the peer-to-peer interaction.
Six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria for the current review. The studies targeted a range of mental health problems including depression and anxiety (n=2), general psychological problems (n=1), eating disorders (n=1), and substance use (tobacco) (n=2). The majority of studies investigated Internet support groups (n=4), and the remaining studies focused on virtual reality chat sessions (n=2). In almost all studies (n=5), the peer support intervention was moderated by health professionals, researchers or consumers. Studies employed a range of study designs including randomized controlled trials (n=3), pre-post studies (n=2) and one randomized trial. Overall, two of the randomized controlled trials were associated with a significant positive outcome in comparison to the control group at post-intervention. In the remaining four studies, peer-to-peer support was not found to be effective.
This systematic review identified an overall lack of high-quality studies examining online peer-to-peer support for young people. Given that peer support is frequently used as an adjunct to Internet interventions for a variety of mental health conditions, there is an urgent need to determine the effectiveness of peer support alone as an active intervention.
青少年和成年早期是精神障碍发展的关键时期。在线同龄人之间的交流在年轻人中很流行,通过提供社会支持可能会改善心理健康。先前的系统评价针对的是有心理健康问题(包括抑郁症)的成年人的互联网支持小组。然而,尚无系统评价研究在线同龄人之间的支持对改善青少年和年轻人心理健康的效果。
本综述的目的是系统地确定现有证据,证明在线同龄人之间的支持对有心理健康问题的年轻人有效。
使用关键词和医学主题词(MeSH)术语在 PubMed、PsycInfo 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行搜索。检索到的摘要(n=3934)进行了双次筛选和编码。如果研究(1)调查了在线同龄人之间的互动,(2)互动讨论了与心理健康相关的主题,(3)样本的年龄范围在 12 至 25 岁之间,以及(4)研究评估了同龄人之间互动的有效性,则将其纳入研究。
有 6 项研究符合当前综述的纳入标准。这些研究针对的是一系列心理健康问题,包括抑郁症和焦虑症(n=2)、一般心理问题(n=1)、饮食障碍(n=1)和物质使用(烟草)(n=2)。大多数研究调查了互联网支持小组(n=4),其余研究则侧重于虚拟现实聊天会话(n=2)。在几乎所有研究中(n=5),健康专业人员、研究人员或消费者都对同伴支持干预进行了调节。研究采用了多种研究设计,包括随机对照试验(n=3)、前后研究(n=2)和一项随机试验。总体而言,与对照组相比,两项随机对照试验在干预后具有显著的积极结果。在其余四项研究中,没有发现同龄人之间的支持有效。
本系统评价发现,总体上缺乏高质量的研究来检验针对年轻人的在线同龄人之间的支持。鉴于同伴支持经常被用作各种心理健康状况的互联网干预的辅助手段,迫切需要确定同伴支持作为一种积极干预措施的有效性。