Lau Darryl, Hervey-Jumper Shawn L, Chang Susan, Molinaro Annette M, McDermott Michael W, Phillips Joanna J, Berger Mitchel S
Departments of 1 Neurological Surgery.
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and.
J Neurosurg. 2016 May;124(5):1300-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.5.JNS1577. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
OBJECT There is evidence that 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) facilitates greater extent of resection and improves 6-month progression-free survival in patients with high-grade gliomas. But there remains a paucity of studies that have examined whether the intensity of ALA fluorescence correlates with tumor cellularity. Therefore, a Phase II clinical trial was undertaken to examine the correlation of intensity of ALA fluorescence with the degree of tumor cellularity. METHODS A single-center, prospective, single-arm, open-label Phase II clinical trial of ALA fluorescence-guided resection of high-grade gliomas (Grade III and IV) was held over a 43-month period (August 2010 to February 2014). ALA was administered at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight. Intraoperative biopsies from resection cavities were collected. The biopsies were graded on a 4-point scale (0 to 3) based on ALA fluorescence intensity by the surgeon and independently based on tumor cellularity by a neuropathologist. The primary outcome of interest was the correlation of ALA fluorescence intensity to tumor cellularity. The secondary outcome of interest was ALA adverse events. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS A total of 211 biopsies from 59 patients were included. Mean age was 53.3 years and 59.5% were male. The majority of biopsies were glioblastoma (GBM) (79.7%). Slightly more than half (52.5%) of all tumors were recurrent. ALA intensity of 3 correlated with presence of tumor 97.4% (PPV) of the time. However, absence of ALA fluorescence (intensity 0) correlated with the absence of tumor only 37.7% (NPV) of the time. For all tumor types, GBM, Grade III gliomas, and recurrent tumors, ALA intensity 3 correlated strongly with cellularity Grade 3; Spearman correlation coefficients (r) were 0.65, 0.66, 0.65, and 0.62, respectively. The specificity and PPV of ALA intensity 3 correlating with cellularity Grade 3 ranged from 95% to 100% and 86% to 100%, respectively. In biopsies without tumor (cellularity Grade 0), 35.4% still demonstrated ALA fluorescence. Of those biopsies, 90.9% contained abnormal brain tissue, characterized by reactive astrocytes, scattered atypical cells, or inflammation, and 8.1% had normal brain. In nonfluorescent (ALA intensity 0) biopsies, 62.3% had tumor cells present. The ALA-associated complication rate among the study cohort was 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS The PPV of utilizing the most robust ALA fluorescence intensity (lava-like orange) as a predictor of tumor presence is high. However, the NPV of utilizing the absence of fluorescence as an indicator of no tumor is poor. ALA intensity is a strong predictor for degree of tumor cellularity for the most fluorescent areas but less so for lower ALA intensities. Even in the absence of tumor cells, reactive changes may lead to ALA fluorescence.
目的 有证据表明,5-氨基乙酰丙酸(ALA)可促进高级别胶质瘤患者更大范围的切除,并改善其6个月的无进展生存期。但目前仍缺乏研究探讨ALA荧光强度与肿瘤细胞密度之间的相关性。因此,开展了一项II期临床试验,以研究ALA荧光强度与肿瘤细胞密度的相关性。方法 在43个月期间(2010年8月至2014年2月),进行了一项单中心、前瞻性、单臂、开放标签的II期临床试验,采用ALA荧光引导切除高级别胶质瘤(III级和IV级)。ALA的给药剂量为20mg/kg体重。收集切除腔的术中活检样本。外科医生根据ALA荧光强度对活检样本进行4级评分(0至3),神经病理学家则独立根据肿瘤细胞密度进行评分。主要研究终点是ALA荧光强度与肿瘤细胞密度的相关性。次要研究终点是ALA不良事件。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和Spearman相关系数。结果 共纳入59例患者的211份活检样本。平均年龄为53.3岁,男性占59.5%。大多数活检样本为胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)(79.7%)。略超过一半(52.5%)的肿瘤为复发性肿瘤。ALA强度为3时,97.4%(PPV)的时间与肿瘤存在相关。然而,无ALA荧光(强度为0)时,仅37.7%(NPV)的时间与无肿瘤相关。对于所有肿瘤类型,包括GBM、III级胶质瘤和复发性肿瘤,ALA强度为3与细胞密度3级密切相关;Spearman相关系数(r)分别为0.65、0.66、0.65和0.62。ALA强度为3与细胞密度3级相关的特异性和PPV分别为95%至100%和86%至100%。在无肿瘤(细胞密度0级)的活检样本中,35.4%仍显示ALA荧光。在这些活检样本中,90.9%含有异常脑组织,特征为反应性星形胶质细胞、散在的非典型细胞或炎症,8.1%为正常脑组织。在无荧光(ALA强度为0)的活检样本中,62.3%存在肿瘤细胞。研究队列中ALA相关并发症发生率为3.4%。结论 利用最强的ALA荧光强度(熔岩样橙色)作为肿瘤存在的预测指标,其PPV较高。然而,利用无荧光作为无肿瘤的指标,其NPV较差。对于荧光最强的区域,ALA强度是肿瘤细胞密度程度的有力预测指标,但对于较低的ALA强度则不然。即使没有肿瘤细胞,反应性改变也可能导致ALA荧光。