Gorissen Kim J, Bloemendaal Alexander L A, Prapasrivorakul Siriluck, Gosselink Martijn P, Jones Oliver M, Cunningham Chris, Lindsey Ian, Hompes Roel
Pelvic Floor Centre, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Dec;58(12):1182-5. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000489.
The increasing incidence of fecal incontinence and the use of sacral neuromodulation have an increasing impact on health care providers and health care costs.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the technical and clinical success rates, complications, and patient satisfaction of the implantation of permanent sacral nerve stimulation under local anesthesia.
A cohort analysis of consecutive patients with sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence over a period of 1 year was performed.
This study was conducted at a specialized pelvic floor unit in a tertiary care center.
Sixty-one patients were available for the assessment after 1-year follow-up.
Technical success, procedural time, and complications were noted. Clinical outcome (including Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale, and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index were collected prospectively before and after treatment.
All procedures were successfully completed under local anesthesia, with a median total procedural time of 50 minutes (range, 26-72 minutes). All patients were discharged on the day of their procedure. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients (4.9%). At 3 months follow-up, the median Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score was reduced from 37 to 27 (p = 0.001). Both the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale and the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index had improved from 63 to 82 (p < 0.001) and 72 to 90 (p = 0.012). At a mean follow-up of 13 months, both the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale and the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index improved further to 90 (p < 0.001) and 94 (p < 0.001). All patients would recommend the procedure under local anesthesia to other patients. No patients experienced leg pain during follow-up.
This study involved a relatively small group of patients, and patient satisfaction was only recorded for the last 22 patients. No exact cost calculations were made.
Permanent sacral nerve stimulation implantation under local anesthesia has high technical and clinical success rates. It is safe, well tolerated by patients, and has obvious logistical and financial benefits.
大便失禁发病率的上升以及骶神经调节的应用对医疗服务提供者和医疗成本的影响日益增加。
本研究旨在调查局部麻醉下永久性骶神经刺激植入术的技术成功率、临床成功率、并发症及患者满意度。
对连续1年接受骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁的患者进行队列分析。
本研究在一家三级医疗中心的专业盆底治疗单元进行。
61例患者在1年随访后可进行评估。
记录技术成功率、手术时间和并发症。前瞻性收集治疗前后的临床结局(包括大便失禁严重程度指数、大便失禁生活质量量表和胃肠道生活质量指数)。
所有手术均在局部麻醉下成功完成,总手术时间中位数为50分钟(范围26 - 72分钟)。所有患者均在手术当天出院。3例患者(4.9%)出现术后并发症。在3个月随访时,大便失禁严重程度指数评分中位数从37降至27(p = 0.001)。大便失禁生活质量量表和胃肠道生活质量指数分别从63提高到82(p < 0.001)和从72提高到90(p = 0.012)。在平均13个月的随访中,大便失禁生活质量量表和胃肠道生活质量指数进一步提高到90(p < 0.001)和94(p < 0.001)。所有患者都愿意向其他患者推荐局部麻醉下的该手术。随访期间无患者出现腿痛。
本研究涉及的患者群体相对较小,仅记录了最后22例患者的患者满意度。未进行确切的成本计算。
局部麻醉下永久性骶神经刺激植入术具有较高的技术和临床成功率。它安全、患者耐受性良好,具有明显的后勤和经济效益。