Suppr超能文献

α-防御素诊断人工关节周围感染的准确性——最佳可用检测方法?

α-Defensin Accuracy to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection-Best Available Test?

作者信息

Frangiamore Salvatore J, Gajewski Nicholas D, Saleh Anas, Farias-Kovac Mario, Barsoum Wael K, Higuera Carlos A

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Lerner College of Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2016 Feb;31(2):456-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.035. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of a single synovial fluid biomarker, α-defensin, in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection in revision total hip and revision total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients comprising 116 revision total hip arthroplasty and revision total knee arthroplasty procedures performed between May 2013 and March 2014 were prospectively evaluated. Cases were categorized as infected or notinfected using Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Synovial fluid was obtained and tested for α-defensin using a commercially available kit (Synovasure [CD Diagnostics, Baltimore, Maryland]).

RESULTS

For first-stage and single-stage revisions, the α-defensin test had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86%-100%) and a specificity of 98% (95% CI, 90%-100%) with a positive predictive value of 96% (95% CI, 80%-99%) and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 93%-100%).

CONCLUSION

A positive α-defensin test result was significantly more sensitive and specific for predicting infection than current diagnostic testing and should be considered when managing periprosthetic joint infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Study of Diagnostic Test.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是测试单一滑液生物标志物α-防御素在诊断翻修全髋关节置换术和翻修全膝关节置换术中假体周围感染的准确性。

方法

前瞻性评估了2013年5月至2014年3月期间进行的102例患者的116例翻修全髋关节置换术和翻修全膝关节置换术。根据肌肉骨骼感染学会标准将病例分为感染或未感染。获取滑液并使用市售试剂盒(Synovasure [CD Diagnostics,巴尔的摩,马里兰州])检测α-防御素。

结果

对于一期和单期翻修,α-防御素检测的敏感性为100%(95%置信区间[CI],86%-100%),特异性为98%(95%CI,90%-100%),阳性预测值为96%(95%CI,80%-99%),阴性预测值为100%(95%CI,93%-100%)。

结论

α-防御素检测结果为阳性在预测感染方面比当前诊断检测更敏感且更具特异性,在处理假体周围感染时应予以考虑。

证据级别

III级,诊断试验研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验