Jatlaoui Tara C, Riley Halley, Curtis Kathryn M
Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Contraception. 2016 Feb;93(2):93-112. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provide recommendations for use of emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs), including levonorgestrel (LNG) and combined oral contraceptives (COCs). A new ECP formulation, ulipristal acetate (UPA), is now available worldwide. To determine whether LNG, UPA or COC (Yuzpe) ECPs are safe for women with certain characteristics or medical conditions, we searched the PubMed and Cochrane databases for articles published from date of inception until May 2015 pertaining to the safety of LNG, UPA or Yuzpe ECP use. For direct evidence, we considered studies that looked at safety outcomes among women with certain medical conditions or characteristics taking ECPs compared with women not taking ECPs. For indirect evidence, we considered studies that reported pharmacokinetic (PK) data for ECP use among women with certain medical conditions or characteristics and studies that reported safety outcomes among healthy women taking ECPs. Five studies provided direct evidence; of these five studies, four examined LNG or Yuzpe use among pregnant or breastfeeding women, and one reported risk of ectopic pregnancy among women repeatedly using LNG ECPs. Poor pregnancy outcomes were rare among pregnant women who used LNG or Yuzpe ECPs during the conception cycle or early pregnancy. Breastfeeding outcomes did not differ between women exposed to LNG ECP and those unexposed, and there was no increased risk of ectopic pregnancy versus intrauterine pregnancy after repeated use of LNG ECPs compared with nonuse. Forty-five studies provided indirect evidence. One PK study demonstrated that LNG passes into breastmilk but in minimal quantities. In addition, nine studies examined pregnancy outcomes following ECP failure among healthy women, and 35 articles reported adverse events. Studies suggest that serious adverse events are rare among women taking any of these ECP formulations.
Evidence on safety of ECPs among women with characteristics or medical conditions listed within WHO and CDC family planning guidance is limited. However, both direct and indirect evidence for our study question did not suggest any special safety concerns for the use of ECPs among women with particular medical conditions or personal characteristics, such as pregnancy, lactation or frequent ECP use.
世界卫生组织(WHO)和美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)提供了关于紧急避孕药(ECP)使用的建议,包括左炔诺孕酮(LNG)和复方口服避孕药(COC)。一种新型紧急避孕药制剂——醋酸乌利司他(UPA)现已在全球上市。为了确定LNG、UPA或COC(Yuzpe法)紧急避孕药对具有某些特征或患有某些疾病的女性是否安全,我们检索了PubMed和Cochrane数据库,查找从数据库建立之日至2015年5月发表的有关LNG、UPA或Yuzpe法紧急避孕药使用安全性的文章。对于直接证据,我们考虑了那些观察服用紧急避孕药的患有某些疾病或具有某些特征的女性与未服用紧急避孕药的女性的安全结局的研究。对于间接证据,我们考虑了那些报告了患有某些疾病或具有某些特征的女性使用紧急避孕药的药代动力学(PK)数据的研究以及那些报告了健康女性服用紧急避孕药的安全结局的研究。五项研究提供了直接证据;在这五项研究中,四项研究考察了孕妇或哺乳期妇女使用LNG或Yuzpe法紧急避孕药的情况,一项研究报告了反复使用LNG紧急避孕药的女性发生宫外孕的风险。在受孕周期或怀孕早期使用LNG或Yuzpe法紧急避孕药的孕妇中,不良妊娠结局很少见。接触LNG紧急避孕药的女性与未接触者的哺乳结局没有差异,与未使用相比,反复使用LNG紧急避孕药后宫外孕相对于宫内妊娠的风险没有增加。45项研究提供了间接证据。一项PK研究表明LNG会进入母乳,但量极少。此外,九项研究考察了健康女性紧急避孕药失败后的妊娠结局,35篇文章报告了不良事件。研究表明,服用任何一种此类紧急避孕药制剂的女性中严重不良事件很少见。
世界卫生组织和美国疾病控制与预防中心计划生育指南中列出的具有某些特征或患有某些疾病的女性使用紧急避孕药的安全性证据有限。然而,我们研究问题的直接和间接证据均未表明具有特定疾病或个人特征(如怀孕、哺乳或频繁使用紧急避孕药)的女性使用紧急避孕药存在任何特殊的安全问题。