Wampler Muskardin Theresa, Vashisht Priyanka, Dorschner Jessica M, Jensen Mark A, Chrabot Beverly S, Kern Marlena, Curtis Jeffrey R, Danila Maria I, Cofield Stacey S, Shadick Nancy, Nigrovic Peter A, St Clair E William, Bingham Clifton O, Furie Richard, Robinson William, Genovese Mark, Striebich Christopher C, O'Dell James R, Thiele Geoffrey M, Moreland Larry W, Levesque Marc, Bridges S Louis, Gregersen Peter K, Niewold Timothy B
Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Division of Rheumatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;75(10):1757-62. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208001. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
Studies suggest that circulating type I interferon (IFN) may predict response to biological agents in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Prediction of response prior to initiating therapy would represent a major advancement.
We studied sera from a test set of 32 patients with RA from the Auto-immune Biomarkers Collaborative Network Consortium and a validation set of 92 patients with RA from the Treatment Efficacy and Toxicity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Database and Repository registry. The test set included those with good response or no response to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors at 14 weeks by European League Against Rheumatism criteria. The validation set included subjects with good, moderate or no response at 12 weeks. Total serum type I IFN activity, IFN-α and IFN-β activity were measured using a functional reporter cell assay.
In the test set, an increased ratio of IFN-β to IFN-α (IFN-β/α activity ratio) in pretreatment serum associated with lack of response to TNF inhibition (p=0.013). Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody titre and class of TNF inhibitor did not influence this relationship. A receiver-operator curve supported a ratio of 1.3 as the optimal cut-off. In the validation set, subjects with an IFN-β/α activity ratio >1.3 were significantly more likely to have non-response than good response (OR=6.67, p=0.018). The test had 77% specificity and 45% sensitivity for prediction of non-response compared with moderate or good response. Meta-analysis of test and validation sets confirmed strong predictive capacity of IFN-β/α activity ratio (p=0.005).
Increased pretreatment serum IFN-β/α ratio strongly associated with non-response to TNF inhibition. This study supports further investigation of serum type I IFN in predicting outcome of TNF inhibition in RA.
研究表明,循环中的I型干扰素(IFN)可能预测类风湿关节炎(RA)患者对生物制剂的反应。在开始治疗前预测反应将是一项重大进展。
我们研究了来自自身免疫生物标志物协作网络联盟的32例RA患者测试集和来自类风湿关节炎治疗疗效与毒性数据库及储存库登记处的92例RA患者验证集的血清。测试集包括根据欧洲抗风湿病联盟标准在14周时对肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂有良好反应或无反应的患者。验证集包括在12周时有良好、中等或无反应的受试者。使用功能性报告细胞测定法测量血清总I型干扰素活性、IFN-α和IFN-β活性。
在测试集中,治疗前血清中IFN-β与IFN-α的比值(IFN-β/α活性比值)升高与对TNF抑制无反应相关(p=0.013)。抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体滴度和TNF抑制剂类别不影响这种关系。受试者工作特征曲线支持将1.3作为最佳临界值。在验证集中,IFN-β/α活性比值>1.3的受试者无反应的可能性明显高于良好反应(OR=6.67,p=0.018)。与中等或良好反应相比,该测试对无反应预测的特异性为77%,敏感性为45%。对测试集和验证集的荟萃分析证实了IFN-β/α活性比值具有很强的预测能力(p=0.005)。
治疗前血清IFN-β/α比值升高与对TNF抑制无反应密切相关。本研究支持进一步研究血清I型干扰素在预测RA中TNF抑制结果方面的作用。