Griffith University, Smart Water Research Centre, School of Environment, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.
Advanced Water Management Centre, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA), Technological Park of the University of Girona, 17003, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan 15;542(Pt A):672-84. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.125. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
During disinfection, bromide, iodide and natural organic matter (NOM) in source waters can lead to the formation of brominated and/or iodinated disinfection by-products (DBPs), which are often more toxic than their chlorinated analogues. The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of a silver-impregnated activated carbon (SIAC) with the equivalent unimpregnated granular activated carbon (GAC) for the removal of bromide, iodide and NOM from a matrix of synthetic waters with variable NOM, halide, and alkalinity concentrations, and to investigate the impact on DBP formation. An enhanced coagulation (EC) pre-treatment was employed prior to sample exposure to either carbon adsorbent. Excellent halide removals were observed by the SIAC treatment across the sample matrix, with iodide concentrations consistently reduced to below the method reporting limit (<2 μg/L) from as high as 25 μg/L, and 95±4% removal of bromide achieved. Bromide removal by unimpregnated GAC was poor, however iodide removal was comparable to that achieved by SIAC. The combination of EC with SIAC treatment removed 77±8% of the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) present, across the sample matrix, which was similar to removals by EC/GAC (67±14%). Combined EC/SIAC treatment reduced both total trihalomethanes (tTHMs) and total dihaloacetonitriles (tDHANs) formation by 97±3%, while also achieving a greater than 74% removal of two chloropropanones and a 92±8% decrease in chloral hydrate (CH), compared to untreated samples, regardless of the sample's starting water quality (bromide, alkalinity and NOM concentration). Combined EC/GAC treatment led to similar DBP removals to EC/SIAC for the fully chlorinated DBPs, however, brominated DBPs were less efficiently removed, or experienced concentration increases.
在消毒过程中,水源中的溴化物、碘化物和天然有机物(NOM)会导致溴代和/或碘代消毒副产物(DBP)的形成,这些副产物通常比其氯化类似物毒性更大。本研究的目的是比较载银活性炭(SIAC)与等效的未浸渍颗粒活性炭(GAC)对合成水中不同 NOM、卤化物和碱度浓度基质中溴化物、碘化物和 NOM 的去除效率,并研究其对 DBP 形成的影响。在样品暴露于任何一种碳吸附剂之前,采用强化混凝(EC)预处理。SIAC 处理在整个样品基质中表现出优异的卤化物去除效果,将高达 25μg/L 的碘化物浓度始终降低至低于方法报告限值(<2μg/L),溴化物的去除率达到 95±4%。然而,未浸渍的 GAC 对溴化物的去除效果较差,但碘化物的去除效果与 SIAC 相当。EC 与 SIAC 联合处理可去除样品基质中 77±8%的溶解有机碳(DOC),与 EC/GAC(67±14%)的去除率相似。联合 EC/SIAC 处理可将总三卤甲烷(tTHMs)和总二卤乙腈(tDHANs)的形成量降低 97±3%,同时还可将两种氯代丙酮和氯仿(CH)的去除率分别提高 74%以上,与未经处理的样品相比,无论样品的起始水质(溴化物、碱度和 NOM 浓度)如何。与 EC/SIAC 相比,联合 EC/GAC 处理对完全氯化的 DBP 具有相似的 DBP 去除效果,但溴化 DBP 的去除效率较低,或浓度增加。