• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2014 年使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心公开支付数据库对放射肿瘤学家的行业支付情况进行检查。

Examination of Industry Payments to Radiation Oncologists in 2014 Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database.

机构信息

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jan 1;94(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.004
PMID:26547386
Abstract

PURPOSE

To use the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments database to characterize payments made to radiation oncologists and compare their payment profile with that of medical and surgical oncologists.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The June 2015 release of the Open Payments database was accessed, containing all payments made to physicians in 2014. The general payments dataset was used for analysis. Data on payments made to medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists was obtained and compared. Within radiation oncology, data regarding payment category, sponsorship, and geographic distribution were identified. Basic statistics including mean, median, range, and sum were calculated by provider and by transaction.

RESULTS

Among the 3 oncologic specialties, radiation oncology had the smallest proportion (58%) of compensated physicians and the lowest mean ($1620) and median ($112) payment per provider. Surgical oncology had the highest proportion (84%) of compensated physicians, whereas medical oncology had the highest mean ($6371) and median ($448) payment per physician. Within radiation oncology, nonconsulting services accounted for the most money to physicians ($1,042,556), whereas the majority of the sponsors were medical device companies (52%). Radiation oncologists in the West accepted the most money ($2,041,603) of any US Census region.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation oncologists in 2014 received a large number of payments from industry, although less than their medical or surgical counterparts. As the Open Payments database continues to be improved, it remains to be seen whether this information will be used by patients to inform choice of providers or by lawmakers to enact policy regulating physician-industry relationships.

摘要

目的

利用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)的公开支付数据库(Open Payments database)来描述支付给放射肿瘤学家的款项,并将其支付情况与医学肿瘤学家和外科肿瘤学家进行比较。

方法和材料

访问了 2015 年 6 月发布的公开支付数据库,其中包含了 2014 年向医生支付的所有款项。使用通用支付数据集进行分析。获取并比较了支付给医学、外科和放射肿瘤学家的款项数据。在放射肿瘤学领域,确定了支付类别、赞助和地理分布的数据。根据提供者和交易计算了平均值、中位数、范围和总和等基本统计数据。

结果

在这 3 个肿瘤学专业中,放射肿瘤学的受偿医生比例最小(58%),每位医生的平均($1620)和中位数($112)支付额最低。外科肿瘤学的受偿医生比例最高(84%),而医学肿瘤学的每位医生的平均($6371)和中位数($448)支付额最高。在放射肿瘤学领域,非咨询服务向医生支付的款项最多($1,042,556),而大多数赞助商是医疗设备公司(52%)。美国任何一个普查区的医生接受的来自西部的款项最多($2,041,603)。

结论

尽管 2014 年放射肿瘤学家从行业获得了大量款项,但比他们的医学或外科同行少。随着公开支付数据库的不断改进,尚不清楚这些信息是否会被患者用来告知选择提供者的决策,或者被立法者用来制定规范医生与行业关系的政策。

相似文献

1
Examination of Industry Payments to Radiation Oncologists in 2014 Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database.2014 年使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心公开支付数据库对放射肿瘤学家的行业支付情况进行检查。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jan 1;94(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
2
Evaluation of Sex Distribution of Industry Payments Among Radiation Oncologists.评估放射肿瘤学家的行业报酬中的性别分布。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187377. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7377.
3
Distribution and Patterns of Industry-Related Payments to Oncologists in 2014.2014年肿瘤学家行业相关报酬的分布与模式
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Jul 7;108(12). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw163. Print 2016 Dec.
4
IR and the Sunshine Act: Two-Year Analysis of the Open Payments Database and Comparison with Related Specialties.《信息自由法案》与《阳光法案》:公开支付数据库的两年分析及与相关专业的比较
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Feb;28(2):200-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
5
Medical industry at tumor board: Three-years analysis of the open payments database and comparison of oncologic specialties.肿瘤多学科会诊中的医疗行业:开放支付数据库的三年分析及肿瘤专科比较
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;117(4):551-557. doi: 10.1002/jso.24899. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
6
Industry ties in otolaryngology: initial insights from the physician payment sunshine act.耳鼻喉科领域的行业关系:《医生薪酬阳光法案》带来的初步见解
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jun;152(6):993-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599815573718. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
7
Representation of Women With Industry Ties in Ophthalmology.有业界关系的女性在眼科学领域的代表性。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 1;134(6):636-43. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0552.
8
Industry Funding Among Leadership in Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology in 2015.2015年医学肿瘤学和放射肿瘤学领域领导层中的行业资助情况。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Oct 1;99(2):280-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.202. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
9
Assessment of Nonresearch Industry Payments to Otolaryngologists in 2014 and 2015.2014 年和 2015 年耳鼻喉科医生的非研究产业支付评估。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jun;158(6):1028-1034. doi: 10.1177/0194599818758661. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
10
Analysis of current financial relationships between emergency physicians and industry.分析急诊医师与产业界当前的财务关系。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;37(4):722-725. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.12.039. Epub 2018 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review.利益冲突映射:范围综述。
BMJ. 2021 Nov 3;375:e066576. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066576.
2
Evaluation of Sex Distribution of Industry Payments Among Radiation Oncologists.评估放射肿瘤学家的行业报酬中的性别分布。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187377. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7377.
3
Industry Funding Is Correlated With Publication Productivity of US Academic Radiation Oncologists.产业资助与美国学术放射肿瘤学家的出版生产力相关。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Feb;16(2):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
4
Choosing wisely in oncology: necessity and obstacles.肿瘤学中的明智选择:必要性与障碍
ESMO Open. 2018 Jul 11;3(5):e000382. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000382. eCollection 2018.
5
Undisclosed conflicts of interest among biomedical textbook authors.生物医学教科书作者中未披露的利益冲突。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):59-68. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1436095. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
Influence of pharmaceutical marketing on Medicare prescriptions in the District of Columbia.制药营销对哥伦比亚特区医疗保险处方的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 25;12(10):e0186060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186060. eCollection 2017.
7
Association between payments from manufacturers of pharmaceuticals to physicians and regional prescribing: cross sectional ecological study.制药厂商向医生支付款项与地区处方之间的关联:横断面生态研究。
BMJ. 2016 Aug 18;354:i4189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4189.
8
Distribution and Patterns of Industry-Related Payments to Oncologists in 2014.2014年肿瘤学家行业相关报酬的分布与模式
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Jul 7;108(12). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw163. Print 2016 Dec.