Alvarez-Fuentes G, Appuhamy J A D R N, Kebreab E
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, C. P. 78000, México; Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616.
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616.
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jan;99(1):771-82. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10092. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
Mathematical models for predicting P excretions play a key role in evaluating P use efficiency and monitoring the environmental impact of dairy cows. However, the majority of extant models require feed intake as predictor variable, which is not routinely available at farm level. The objectives of the study were to (1) explore factors explaining heterogeneity in P output; (2) develop a set of empirical models for predicting P output in feces (Pf), manure (PMa), and milk (Pm, all in g/cow per day) with and without dry matter intake (DMI) using literature data; and (3) evaluate new and extant P models using an independent data set. Random effect meta-regression analyses were conducted using 190 Pf, 97 PMa, and 118 Pm or milk P concentration (PMilkC) treatment means from 38 studies. Dietary nutrient composition, milk yield and composition, and days in milk were used as potential covariates to the models with and without DMI. Dietary phosphorus intake (Pi) was the major determinant of Pf and PMa. Milk yield negatively affected Pi partitioning to Pf or PMa. In the absence of DMI, milk yield, body weight, and dietary P content became the major determinants of Pf and PMa. Milk P concentration (PMilkC) was heterogeneous across the treatment groups, with a mean of 0.92 g/kg of milk. Milk yield, days in milk, and dietary Ca-to-ash ratio were negatively correlated with PMilkC and explained 42% of the heterogeneity. The new models predicted Pf and PMa with root mean square prediction error as a percentage of observed mean (RMSPE%) of 18.3 and 19.2%, respectively, using DMI when evaluated with an independent data set. Some of the extant models also predicted Pf and PMa well (RMSPE%=19.3 to 20.0%) using DMI. The new models without DMI as a variable predicted Pf and PMa with RMSPE% of 22.3 and 19.6%, respectively, which can be used in monitoring P excretions at farm level. When evaluated with an independent data set, the new model and extant models based on milk protein content predicted PMilkC with RMSPE% of 12.7 to 19.6%. Although models using P intake information gave better predictions, P output from lactating dairy cows can also be predicted well without intake using milk yield, milk protein content, body weight, and dietary P, Ca, and total ash contents.
预测磷排泄量的数学模型在评估奶牛磷利用效率和监测其对环境的影响方面发挥着关键作用。然而,大多数现有模型需要将采食量作为预测变量,而这在农场层面并非常规可得数据。本研究的目的是:(1)探究解释磷输出异质性的因素;(2)利用文献数据建立一组经验模型,用于预测有无干物质采食量(DMI)情况下粪便(Pf)、粪肥(PMa)和牛奶(Pm,均以克/头/天计)中的磷输出量;(3)使用独立数据集评估新的和现有的磷模型。利用来自38项研究的190个Pf、97个PMa以及118个Pm或牛奶磷浓度(PMilkC)处理均值进行随机效应元回归分析。日粮营养成分、产奶量和成分以及泌乳天数被用作有无DMI模型的潜在协变量。日粮磷摄入量(Pi)是Pf和PMa的主要决定因素。产奶量对Pi分配到Pf或PMa有负面影响。在没有DMI的情况下,产奶量、体重和日粮磷含量成为Pf和PMa的主要决定因素。各处理组间牛奶磷浓度(PMilkC)存在异质性,平均为0.92克/千克牛奶。产奶量、泌乳天数和日粮钙与灰分比与PMilkC呈负相关,可解释42%的异质性。当使用独立数据集进行评估时,新模型在使用DMI的情况下预测Pf和PMa的均方根预测误差占观测均值的百分比(RMSPE%)分别为18.3%和19.2%。一些现有模型在使用DMI时对Pf和PMa的预测也较好(RMSPE% = 19.3%至20.0%)。不将DMI作为变量的新模型预测Pf和PMa的RMSPE%分别为22.3%和19.6%,可用于农场层面的磷排泄监测。当使用独立数据集进行评估时,基于牛奶蛋白含量的新模型和现有模型预测PMilkC的RMSPE%为12.7%至19.6%。虽然使用磷摄入量信息的模型预测效果更好,但不考虑摄入量,仅利用产奶量、牛奶蛋白含量、体重以及日粮磷、钙和总灰分含量,也能较好地预测泌乳奶牛的磷输出量。